DrownedinSound message boarder yes_ has lashed out at pavement, as the war of words between the two continues to escalate.
Asked about the feud by a journalist from thelondonpaper, yes_ first objected to the line of questioning, citing it as “unnecessary” and “f*cking inflammatory”.
But, when pressed on the issue, he admitted that pavement’s “lack of artistic merit” was at the core of his loathing before launching into an impassioned tirade.
“pavement has no artistic merit.
“Key phrase: "NO ARTISTIC MERIT"
“I really dont care if shes "fun" or whatever: NO ARTISTIC MERIT”
Quite why yes_ believes pavement should have artistic merit is not yet known but is quickly becoming moot; this latest diatribe pushing the war of words on into personal territory. Irrationality, it seems, is imminent.
Despite any protestations from yes_ - “I don’t pay no attention to haters” - today’s words are undoubtedly a retort to comments made on Tuesday, in which pavement accused _yes of “completely missing the point”.
“I am ground. N’a’mean? I take all this shit, all this rank, fuckin... gum from mans and their dogs messin all up on me.
“People think they can, liek, chat this shit n that but I ain’t no pussy’ole. I ain’t just gonna let mans walk all over me, bruv, get me?
"Wasteman."
Normally so reserved, pavement’s involvement in the row is being credited by observers in the media as the latest development in a worrying downward spiral.
“Everyone knows pavey hasn’t been the same since Karl went to jail,” says a source from new media agency SCRARP with his ear to the ground; referring to the trial and subsequent jailing of ex-squeeze Karl Watkins in 1993 on charges of outraging public decency.
Watkins was, of course, caught making love to pavement in 1993 and, despite protests from pavement rights activists, was sent down for 18 months. After receiving psychiatric ‘help’ in this time, their bond was never quite the same.
“Pavement was fine with it for a while,” continued the source, “she drank her way out of the problem, truth be told. But now the truth’s hit home and she’s really nostalgic for their time together. She just misses that closeness, y'know?”
yes_’s harangue continued for a good few minutes, concluding with a bizarre sign-off.
“The people doing the "it's just ground": shut up. Seriously. This is supposed to be about proper ground. Pavement is not proper ground. Don't try and argue with me about what "proper" ground is, because all that matters is that pavement isnt it.“The people doing the old "look at user profile and criticise a ground I like": Shut up. RHCPs music is at least made with artistic intent, and if you've ever actually listened to an album of theirs you'd know they werent just "white funk".
“In conclusion: I am king; DiSsenters will be shot."
Got news? Email us at newsdesk@drownedinsound.com for back slaps and a credit...
I AM GOD!
(to people intentionally always get the underslash mixed up)
-=sigh=-
^ban request
Is this news?
Is this booze?
No, tea.
Mmmm, tea.
I have to eat: but what?
Suggestions, please.
Me - pretty akin to jesus christ?
Persecuted by "The man" (see: http://drownedinsound.com/articles/2534621)
Derided by the majority
A revolutionary
A true hero in his time
Spreading the good word
YUP. PRETTY MUCH
(don't worry, i'm sure this article will be deleted quick sharp)
i love you joash
but your thread was ultrasilly.
This is the most significant
and groundbreaking piece of journalism I've ever come into contact with and has made my day
This is the most injokey thing I've ever read
and the fact it's currently turning up on RSS feeds worldwide gives me an odd sense of joy.
What the hell
what the hell
DiS:
a very very serious website!!!!!
except on fridays
see also: http://www.subpop.com/features/pdork/
lolololol
WTF.
I love Josh
He's a DiS hero.
HYPERLOLZ
If I really cared...
I'd be quite pissed off by this, just another step DiS has taken from being quite an interesting music website towards being a cliquey message board full of in-jokes.
But it's just the internet, so whatever.
It's not though, is it?
A 'step from being an interesting music website'... it's nice, sometimes, to not be wholly serious.
injokes in all their forms
make me ridiculously happy. seriously.
that probably makes me annoying and cliquey :(
"A cliquey message board full of in-jokes"
Yes. See also: every Internet message board ever.
yeah, but...
when the message board/ community side of it crosses over with the 'news' section, it just seems a bit wrong.
to be fair, i didn't read much of the thread this article is referencing.
stopped reading a paragraph in
someone want to give me the gist? oh, wait...
Seriously guys. Stop it.
Or I'm gonna walk.
*wank
THIS IS LOLDMCDONALDHADAFARM
MORE OF THIS!
That thread
is car-crash stuff for yes_.
"How to be so wrong that you make the front page"
This is has undoubtedly done more to scare people from
DiS, than anything, ever.
Although it IS
genius
next friday
plz have x-factor predictions
Stroke of genius
Probably the most effective way of undercutting yes_'s stupid, self-important rant about the kate nash interview.
Ver' amusing
Wow, in jokes
...
I just
set my homepage to pitchfork.
TAKE THAT, DiS!
careful
he'll write a news story about you
lolz x 10
Brilliant!
:D
Hilarious/Ridiculous / Ridiculous/Hilarious
Ridiculously hilarious or hilariously ridiculous?
Maybe it's neither. Maybe... it's a metaphor.
!
This is pathetic
Yes, but:
Just because there's a lot of pavement in the world, doesn't mean it's worth writing about. Same goes for lame arse pop music.
<3
superb.
I have
mixed opinions on said Nash article, but this as a news story just takes the piss.
I've nothing against injokes within the forum, but to take it onto the main content of the site just seems to cheapen it. If everytime someone on the forum disagrees with an aspect of the site it makes a news story then there wouldn't be anything else to read about in the news section.
After the site's (probably justified) reaction to all the sweary thread titles, it seems really hypocritical to put something as immature as this in the news.
dammmmmn
it's just a joke.
get over it; either laugh or move on.
i don't find it funny but i'm not gonna moan, just moan at those that care so much that they are outraged at an injoke that doesn't involve them.
it's not real news, but how cares? it's the internet.
sleep time.
It's really not immature now, is it?
It's just a little mean-nothing fun on a Friday. I think we're allowed that, the week we've had.
You read it as rubbish? Cool: there's lots of serious, 'proper' content here. In fact, everything bar this last-thing-on-a-Friday 'news' is DEADLY serious.
You read it as a bit of a laugh: cool. Welcome to us letting off steam.
The day DiS is forever straight-faced and hard-factual is the day we become... like no music magazine out there. If we took this business seriously all the time we'd all have breakdowns.
IS THIS NEWS?!
:D this has made my day.
I don't really get it.
I mean, I see it's meant to be satire but it's just rubbish.
^
i kept thinking it was about the band Pavement.
You're so pedestrian.
.
That's not why I don't get it
though it does make it weirder. I guess I think you should either do satire or surrealist humour. Trying to combine the two, unless you've the intellectual wit of Monty Python, is fruitless.
Moreover, the original thread is already comedy gold so taking the piss out of it is worthless.
exactly.
the whole thing was pulled off in a really shitty way, and completely doesn't work at all.
i feel embarrassed for DiS.
fuck is this shit
Hilarious, absolutely and completely hilarious
it's a little convoluted and long, but so funny. I hope one day to get featured.
aww
he's only a nipper.
i don't forum much
but even i can see this is genuine newsgold.
haters be silenced!
I am confused.
Am I missing something here?
Only my brave defence of musical integrity
against the tyrannies of evil men
http://drownedinsound.com/articles/2530691
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pointless
people complaining:
it's ONE NEWS ARTICLE.
there are about 6 every day, and this is ONE that yes, will only really be of interest to a couple of hundred people. but some of the bands written about are of interest to less people, frankly. it might also make some people check out the boards, and then their lives can be as unfulfilling as mine.
but
people are given the facility to comment on each article for a reason, no? if they choose to use that to complain, fair enough. it's not as though users are asked to bear in mind the whole content of DiS on any given day, each time they post a comment.
interactivity = the DiS model, right?
wut?
im not saying theyre not allowed to comment, or to think that the article is crap. just saying that people who think that this article means that the whole site is going to hell in a handcart are retards. what on earth has that got to do with interactivity?