Drowned in Sound

Search



10 votes
?
by Dom Gourlay

What a difference a year makes. Less than twelve months ago The Long Blondes were headlining (and almost selling out) Rock City, a venue almost twice the size as the main refectory of the city's Trent University. This evening, poor advance ticket sales and a £15 door tax means they end up playing to a barely half-full venue.

Still, it could be worse. They could have the graveyard slot like openers XX Teens whose audience consists of a mere 37 people (and I did count them), which is a shame as for all the technical glitches and occasional sound problems - at one point the bass amp sounds like it's about to explode, the reverberating top-string cutting through many a midriff - their Fall-meets-Neu! down the Junk Club material is strangely compelling, even if some punters are left scratching their heads at the band favouring percussive repetition over straight-forward tunage. Their current repertoire certainly represents a marked departure from their previous incarnation as Xerox Teens, while in drummer Macks Faulkron they possess the most ferocious sticksman since Animal last manned the Muppets band’s kit.

Whisper it, but these are ominously difficult times for The Long Blondes. Not many bands could survive the breakdown of one personal relationship, let alone two, so when both of those fall apart in just a few months it doesn't make the working environment a particularly happy place. Add to that largely lukewarm reviews for their comeback album and there's almost a feeling of being back to square one again, almost like the time when they were trying to get signed, several points still to prove.

However, what they do possess is a focal centre of attention in Kate Jackson; a born star if ever there was one, and someone whose prominence will undoubtedly ensure that even during their most difficult times The Long Blondes as a unit shall prevail.

There are times this evening when that almost falls apart. Drummer Screech Louder's between-song interjections about toga parties and other random nonsense coupled with Dorian Cox's hissy fit at one of the soundmen during 'Century', culminating in his guitar being turned up to a ridiculously high level, threatens to usurp the momentum, but thankfully a quick delve into their back catalogue restores parity, not to mention any onstage tension.

And that's part of the problem. For all "Couples"’ attempts at being innovative, a lot of the material pales - 'Round The Hairpin' and next single 'Guilt' being the main exceptions - when aired back to back with older material like 'You Could Have Both' or early single 'Autonomy Boy', given a rare outing this evening.

On the whole, tonight's show pretty much reaffirms that for all their lofty ambitions of grandeur, The Long Blondes are better suited to more intimate settings.

Photo: _mei (from Flickr)

  • The Long Blondes 7 / 10
  • xx Teens 7 / 10
Words: Dom Gourlay

the couples in the long blondes broke up AGES ago

and their album got amazing reveiws, 4 out of 5 stars in most places. The only place is saw a 'lukewarm' review was in NME.


All i am saying is

the vast majority of reviews for the record have been very positive, even this website gave the record 8/10. Its done quite well sales wise too. crawdaddy? gigwise? I'm sure the blondes won't be losing sleep over that one.


The only positive reviews I've seen

are in the Independent and Guardian. It got 8 on here but no disrespect to Rob, knowing his stance on the band that was hardly unexpected.


I quite like xx Teens

Long Blondes bore the hell out of me


xx Teens

surprised me here. I was half expecting some nu rave scenester bandwagon jumpers but got an interesting mix of Fall-isms and krautrock rhythmic loops instead.


my impression on this was dom's

but metacritic says 81.
and metacritic NEVER LIES


^ this ^

TLBs FTW.


74 actually

I bet it would be lower if they totted up every review. Not that it matters a jot of course...


"knowing his stance on the band that was hardly unexpected"

So you're saying I made my mind up what score to give the album without really listening to it? That's actually pretty insulting Dom.


Not directly perhaps

But that quote certainly suggests I had some kind of bias. And what is my stance towards the band, exactly?


You make no secret of the fact

that you're a big fan. Nothing wrong in that, but the law of probability states that in such an instance you would be less likely to be critically harsh than someone who wasn't a particularly big fan.


The album

might have done OK with the critics but sales wise it's bombed hasn't it? Correct me if i'm wrong but didn't it debut at number 48 in the charts? In the current climate Long Blondes should easily be able to break the top 20 album chart.


And when all's said and done

the sales figures are what matter.


That was more of a comment

on AndrewViolets reply. I don't think anyone who reads Dis regularly give a damn about chart positions.


You're right.


my point is

that the record has been successful on a number of different levels, and it is certainly not a 'dark time' for the long blondes or whatever is alluded to in the review.


To a point yes

but in comparison to the peaks associated with 'Someone To Drive You Home' both critically and commercially at this moment in time you have to admit the Long Blondes are on a downward spiral. Surely the fact that less than a year ago they were selling out venues of 1700 as opposed to the fact they're struggling to half fill ones with a 900 capacity illustrates this.


i'd just like to say

"good luck...we're counting on you"


we'll agree to disagree on that one

i'd say the £15 entry fee had alot to do with that. They see to be bigger in London than ever, even people who i work with who know nothing about music like them now.

Plus its early days for the record as well, they will do well on the festival curcuit.


I hope you're right

as I do have a lot of time for the Long Blondes. I just think commercially they've had their 15 minutes...