Drowned in Sound

Search



Indie Etiquette: Gig Posters

6 votes
?
by Panic

Do you think you should have been at a gig to buy a poster for it, or is that irrelevant if you like the band?

Panic | 09 May '08, 18:25 | Send note | Report this | Reply

Irrelevant

Next!


I'd like a second opinion

What if someone saw it, said "Oh, I like them, were at that one?", and you're left there looking like a pleb mouthing how you didn't and just wanted the poster - not a little poseur-ish at all??? DAMN IT WHAT ABOUT THAT?


Just lie

As long as you like the band I think it's acceptable. If you've never heard any of their music and are just buying it to look cool, that's different. In which a case, you're a cock.

* Disclaimer: You = not *you*


i've got some

beautiful tom waits, shins and mark lanegan posters framed on my wall from australian tours....they just have some great one-off artwork for gigs over there thats sadly lacking in the uk.
so, obviously i wasnt at those gigs but hell i love those bands/artists and the posters are gorgeous.


^ this

I've got one from Radiohead in Nimes and The Shins New Zealand tour - sadly wasn't at either but both acts firmly in my top 5.


Not posters

If I really like the band I'll usually buy a t-shirt.


Nope, it's more if you like the band

or that's how I see it at least. Especially when it's bands who don't have posters stocked in Zavvi.


Surely

the artwork plays a huge part?

If you love the band and the poster is well designed, then i don't see any problem.

If you've got a picture of Kurt or Ian Curtis on your wall then that's a little more weird.


Well yeah

but I'd be more likely to buy a Radiohead one than a.. Les Savy Fav one or something.