interesting! but it does seem like people are making a mountain out of a mole-hill; they didn't use the track officially and maybe they didn't know who the madonna artist was.
but they didn't release it officially, that's all.
the thing i read was a compilation of all the things they stole, turns out that madonna picture with a black eye was stolen and despite knowing they're still selling t-shirts and seem to not want to pay the artist anything.
even their logo is a rip of chanel, but that must've been deliberate.
without saying who its from, they would have probibly made it freakin ages ago when they had no idea they were gona get big and have to tell someone they sampled somat.
I stayed with him during a Creative Commons festival in Brussels. There is such a huge community of underground artists who are putting their trust in CC and it obviously isn't working.
They attempted to nick my friend's keyboard stand when they supported Crystal Castles. CC obviously didn't know they'd be supporting them two days later. Idiots.
it's not really enforced, it comes across as more of a plea than a rule. Flickr actively uses the Creative Commons licenses on photos but still hundreds, if not thousands of photos get used against the wishes off the author. It's difficult to argue something isn't in the public domain the moment you place it in public internet space.
lo-bat is so much better then crystal castles
its not right completely stealing other peoples music
wheres the originality, shouldnt they be writing the own music
Be ready for that all important extra layer of deniability ('the label mistakenly put the demos online without our permision'). Marvel as they wriggle on the hook, having being caught out on three separate occasions!
i'd definitely say Covox have a copyright claim against CC, you are copyrighted once you make anything, regardless of release, i'd stick it to them and get a lawsuit on the go!
I quite like some Crystal Castles songs, (if indeed they're all really Crystal Castles songs after all). But discovering this has made me quite glad I stole their album off the internet, rather than paying for it. Seems appropriate somehow.
chiptune people seem to be going a bit ott with the backlash, 'fuck crystal castles' and all that. seems a bit too bitter, hint of jealousy over their sucess maybe?
yeah
found out about this a few days ago.
interesting! but it does seem like people are making a mountain out of a mole-hill; they didn't use the track officially and maybe they didn't know who the madonna artist was.
but i doubt it. it's shameful!
Have you heard the two tracks?
Crystal Castles have basically rearranged the Lo Bat song and added vocals. Pretty shit if you ask me.
i know it's basically a carbon copy
but they didn't release it officially, that's all.
the thing i read was a compilation of all the things they stole, turns out that madonna picture with a black eye was stolen and despite knowing they're still selling t-shirts and seem to not want to pay the artist anything.
even their logo is a rip of chanel, but that must've been deliberate.
god, what is it about theft and this band?
that madonna pic
timbaland
now this!
Can you imagine
if this was a mainstream indie type band? There'd be uproar!
wasnt the Crystal Castles
trackabout before timberland did that single?
yeah
i meant the notion of theft in general rather than just them nicking stuff
ah yeah dont worry I'm damn slow tonight
people smaple stuff all the time
without saying who its from, they would have probibly made it freakin ages ago when they had no idea they were gona get big and have to tell someone they sampled somat.
i didnt use the word sample
so I didnt get sued for copy write
Weesh
I know that Lo-Bat dude. This is terrible.
Funnily enough
I stayed with him during a Creative Commons festival in Brussels. There is such a huge community of underground artists who are putting their trust in CC and it obviously isn't working.
what do you mean?
'a huge community of underground artists who are putting their trust in CC'
I'm interested.
creative commons copyright license
Not Crystal Castles hahah!
heheh
ahhh right I get ya.
Venice
Ahoy
My main
question is: why haven't Diamonique Bugalows (or whatever) come out and said "yeah, sorry the ideas come from other songs etc"? Puzzling.
The t shirt thing is also dodgy.
....
Bungalows*
wow. i had no idea they ripped images off other artists too..
from what i've read, sounds like they've been complete shits about it too.
They also steal equipment
They attempted to nick my friend's keyboard stand when they supported Crystal Castles. CC obviously didn't know they'd be supporting them two days later. Idiots.
haha
CC is great but
it's not really enforced, it comes across as more of a plea than a rule. Flickr actively uses the Creative Commons licenses on photos but still hundreds, if not thousands of photos get used against the wishes off the author. It's difficult to argue something isn't in the public domain the moment you place it in public internet space.
Therefore, it's not great
If it's in place to protect something and it clearly doesn't matter if it fails, then there's no point in it existing.
What it stands for
is great, and it deserves to be enforced and recognised. As the article clearly says, it's a part of the solution not the problem.
I agree
I've released a couple of things under a CC license. Shame the authorities can't acknowledge it.
isn't that old news?
I think its from about a month ago
..
lo-bat is so much better then crystal castles
its not right completely stealing other peoples music
wheres the originality, shouldnt they be writing the own music
what about
daft punk though, all of their best tunes are just extended samples
but surely it's the fact they didn't credit him
they just passed it off as their own.
aye
but it wasn't released so there's nothign much can be done, plus its good publicty for the lesser known lo-bat right?
^
actually i disagree with my above comment having read the article more fully
By most accounts
Crystal Castles are utter cunts.
I feel
i must make an apology to AvannnnnGuuuuard. At least they haven't outright stolen music, stolen artwork etc etc etc...
Oooh
http://gameboygenius.8bitcollective.com/wordpress/2008/05/06/crystal-castles-and-chip-music-copyright-infringements/
A bit more detail here.
the more I learn about this band,
the more I utterly despise them.
Apparently they'll be telling their side of the story soon
Be ready for that all important extra layer of deniability ('the label mistakenly put the demos online without our permision'). Marvel as they wriggle on the hook, having being caught out on three separate occasions!
Where is DiS on this, by the way?
if you read the gameboy genius linkage from teepee
i'd definitely say Covox have a copyright claim against CC, you are copyrighted once you make anything, regardless of release, i'd stick it to them and get a lawsuit on the go!
You know what?
I quite like some Crystal Castles songs, (if indeed they're all really Crystal Castles songs after all). But discovering this has made me quite glad I stole their album off the internet, rather than paying for it. Seems appropriate somehow.
^ i dont really want their album
but if i did i would download it illegally as it seems fairer
2 wrongs do make a right!
it makes me quite annoyed
that i payed for it, and all the more because i actually like it. they better come up GOOD excuse/reason for this
*with
i do think they're shits, but..
chiptune people seem to be going a bit ott with the backlash, 'fuck crystal castles' and all that. seems a bit too bitter, hint of jealousy over their sucess maybe?
who cares?
I think they are entitled to be as bitter and hateful as they want to be. I don't think anyone should feel sorry for CC.