At one point on Coldplay's fourth album, Chris Martin, millionaire rockstar and male-bride of Oscar-winning Hollywood stalwart Gwyneth ‘homeopathy’ Paltrow, sings: "I'm just so tired of this loneliness".
In 2007, Gwyneth Paltrow starred in a film called The Good Night (directed by her brother), in which she played the girlfriend of an (ex) pop star (played by Martin Freeman of The Office) who dumps said boyfriend due to lack of sex and ambition on his part.
Poor Chris.
The clunkily-titled Viva La Vida (Or Death & All His Friends), despite grandiose talk of Brian Eno (who handles the bulk of production duties), new directions and experimentalism, reveals precious little about Coldplay that we didn't already know; there are pianos, echoed guitars, plangent chords, drums, bass, and catchy but unremarkable melodies delivered by an unimaginative lyricist who's made millions of pounds out of doe-eyed universal platitudes in the last decade. A Delacroix painting on the cover - you can see pubes! And nipples! And cadavers! - and a title cribbed from Frida Kahlo scream "culture" at you, but Coldplay remain resolutely no-brow, a rock band version of Jack Vettriano; art for people who don't like art; crowd-pleasers for people who don't like crowds; music for people who don't like music.
But nevertheless Coldplay are trying here to broaden their palette, to provide some substance for their success. Chris Martin's recent strops at journalists for not giving his band enough credit for their creativity smack of a man suffering a crisis of confidence in the face of a media determined to brand him a polite entertainer rather than a visionary musician. Viva La Vida is a serious effort to redress this.
So what about the songs? There are definitely efforts to branch out. Obvious verse-chorus-verse configurations, as used ad nauseum by Coldplay previously, are lightly eschewed in favour of slightly more oblique song structures, and so the jaunty pianos and arm-waving stadium rock rhythms of ‘Lovers In Japan’ gives way after a few minutes to the delicate ‘Reign In Love’. Stitching them together into one track with a two-part title seems like indulgent prog frippery, though; there's absolutely no reason for it.
There is apparently reason for album opener ‘Life In Technicolor’ being (largely) instrumental, though; upon being told that ‘Life In Technicolor’ was "the obvious single", Martin and company apparently stripped it of its lyric because they didn't want a safety song on the album. Given the wordplay on display elsewhere, this seems like a wise move. They did, however, leave in just enough punch-the-sky percussion and "oh-oh-oh" vocals to turn it into a suitably stadium-shaking set opener for future tours.
The prog-ness of ‘Lovers In Japan’ and ‘Reign In Love’ is demonstrated elsewhere, too – seven-minute songs called ‘Yes’ with Spanish/Arabic (delete as appropriate)-style strings and ‘Pyramid Song’/‘Karma Police’ (delete as appropriate)-aping choruses (plus the aforementioned lyric about loneliness) don't help your punk credentials, not that punk, in 2008, is any less bereft of cultural worth than prog. About four minutes in, ‘Yes’ goes a little My Bloody Valentine-lite for a mid-album secret track apparently called ‘Chinese Sleep Chant’. It sounds a little like something off Final Straw by Snow Patrol, as heard through a wall.
More orthodox is the 4/4 synth-string anthem title track, which you'll undoubtedly know from the ‘exclusive to iTunes’ advert; the one with the line "I sweep the streets I used to roam". It's very nice, a swooningly romantic tune embellished with all sorts of Eno trickery in the margins and lavished with historical references presumably drawn from Martin's University College London degree in Ancient World Studies. This is followed by the lead single and arguable album highlight, the agreeably nodding guitar machismo of ‘Violet Hill’, which, of course, collapses into a delicate piano coda once the band tires of rocking.
There are clunkers as well, though. ‘42’ starts as a cod-profound piano-ballad with the god-awful lyric "those who are dead / are not dead / they're just living in my head" and a none-more-‘Imagine’ piano fill before, after 90 seconds, drums and guitar tones that, in the context of a Coldplay record, sound a little edgy, drop in and cause a giant middle-eight-cum-chorus to swell up in support of the remarkably dumb line "you thought you might be a ghost / you didn't get to heaven but you made it close". The title, presumably, alludes to the meaning of life as revealed in Douglas Adams' Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy. Thanks for that.
The actually really rather nice ‘Strawberry Swing’, with its padding drums, gossamer lead guitar and understated melody, is unfortunately overshadowed by ‘Death & All His Friends’, which starts small and grows large, becoming the kind of easily repeating, lighters-aloft universal rock anthem-not-anthem that Coldplay have specialised in for years. This in turn, and predictably by this point, is followed by three minutes of ambient dappling and breathy platitudes that might be called ‘The Escapist’ but isn't included in the track listing, and which sounds a little bit like the intro to ‘Where The Streets Have No Name’. It's also, incidentally, the exact same sound that opens the album on ‘Life In Technicolor’. Do you see what they did there?
Coldplay have been chastised enough by critics and naysayers that they want to challenge people a little with this record, and if that means leaving vocals off a song that would have otherwise been a single, or sticking two songs together and pretending they're one song, or trying some watered-down 'world music' percussion, then why not?
The problem is that Coldplay's stabs at radicalism just sound so very safe and familiar. Part of their predicament is the production, which, as with almost any other mainstream rock band of the last 15 or so years, processes, auto-tunes, click-tracks, compresses and otherwise bleeds almost all personality out of the entire band's sound. It could be literally anyone playing guitar, drums, bass or piano on this record, hence why I've not used any names other than Martin's – the backing band are incidental. Even Martin's voice, the group's most distinctive asset, is generally processed to death here – but that's how we're used to hearing him anyway. Gone are the days when you could identify a drummer by both his style of play and the sound of his kit, never mind being able to identify what model of guitar someone is playing from its tone.
Admittedly there's more in the way of textural variation here than on 2005's X&Y, which is presumably down to Eno's involvement, but it's still very, very familiar fare. Largely this is because while Eno's work sounded radical in the ‘70s and early ‘80s when barely anyone sounded anything like him, these days anyone with ProTools can download an Oblique Strategies plug-in and hey presto! Ambient wibbling to fade. As a result Viva La Vida is about as sonically radical as Paul Simon's pleasant but decidedly unradical Eno-produced Surprise album from 2006.
Because unless Coldplay do produce something genuinely radical and creative they're doomed to continue the combination of commercial success and critical indifference which seems to rile their singer even as it lines all of their pockets. So cripplingly keen are they to be shown the same respect as former labelmates Radiohead, for instance, that they dim-wittedly try and ape their heroes on numerous occasions but cock it up slightly each time; where Yorke and companions shook the music industry with the release strategy for In Rainbows, Coldplay's flaccid response is to boldly launch Viva La Vida on a Thursday, like Oasis did with Be Here Now in 1997.
They try hard, Coldplay, but it just isn't enough; their fourth album might just be their best yet, but it's still a long way from being the epochal classic that Chris Martin is desperate to create.
I'm kinda on the fence with this album...
There're perhaps three or so songs that I dig, and to be honest, they're okay borderline good... nothing exceptional.
6/10 is spot on.
"might just be their best yet"
i sincerely doubt that 6/10 is anywhere near as good as the fantastic "Parachutes", but i enjoyed this review generally
^ This.
^ Yeah
me too.
Parachutes ist not this gud
So Parachutes would get less than 6?
I've not listened to the album in depth, but that seems a little stingy?
...
Parachutes would get maybe a five from me? The songwriting is very immature and the instrumentation is unexciting. The Blue Room EP was far, far better. Take Trouble for example - it's got a lovely piano hook, a pleasant verse, and a pleasant chorus (however insipid one might choose to argue it might be); but it's either only half a song, or else it's a two-minute song - so Coldplay play it twice back-to-back and pretend it's a whole song. Likewise Everything's Not Lost, and probably others on there too (I've not listened to it in at least five years and don't own it anymore). It's emotionally quite sweet but musically very, very dull.
Also, though
I was trying to agree with the 'i enjoyed this review generally' sentiment.
I was talking to someone about DiS the other day and he commented that there seems to be a lot of people reviewing reviews.
So was I.
?
This review makes me
really curious...
Yeah
Before I wouldn't have given a toss about the album, but after reading this there appears to be tracks which may delight my ears
be curious no more
streaming free on myspace
Agree with the review
would probably give it a five, innofensive - but even for background music, there's much better stuff out there.
.
I'm quite liking it and it's certainly not as dull as X&Y. Reminds me slightly of why I used to spin the Brothers And Sisters EP a fair amount at the turn of the millenium with 4 or so pleasing tracks (which is about all can be expected from a RFUS'er.)
Having a go at Coldplay re: Pro Tools seems a little harsh though. If here, then why not condemn 95% of all other LP reviews with a smiliar tarred brush?
Hmmm
'This is followed by the lead single and arguable album highlight, the agreeably nodding guitar machismo of ‘Violet Hill’'
Thats coming from the same guy who stated this, on the Embrace forum no less...
'Absolutely fucking horrible affect on his vocals. Nasty compressed instrument sounds. No edges. Predictable phoned-in U2-era Eno intro (he did INTERESTING things with Talking Heads). In summary; massive, hollow, absolutely no interest in hearing it again.'
And then, on the same thread when someone expressed their feelings of how the song was 'growing' on him, this was Nick's immediate response...
'Everything grows if played often enough. I have a soft spot for Marillion and Supertramp due to exposure. Doesn't mean they're not fucking shit.'
I think I'll take this review with a pinch of salt.
human being in "changing their mind about something" shocker
in other news, research shows that sometimes music journalists can be a bit hyperbolic for effect
...
If anything I ham it up WAY more on forums.
It's one thing…
…to change your mind, it's another entirely to have drastically opposing views within a very short space of time. Perfectly right it should be questioned. "Sprung"
Makes me think the guy's either on a wind up or shouldn't be believed in case his opinion is having an off day, as it seems to change with the wind.
Anyway, fear not Acquiescence, I wouldn't take anyone seriously who posted on a sodding Embrace forum.
...
You think Coldplay are better than Embrace? I suggest you dig out Embrace's second album.
God yes, Coldplay are better than Embrace.
Embrace are a Verve tribute band. And the Verve were/are fucking abysmal beyond two songs, and one of those was a Stones rip.
...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I take your manic laughter
as total agreement in the harsh light of reality.
...
Re; ProTools, etc - I try and condemn 95% of all other LP reviews with a similar brush!
See this - http://www.stylusmagazine.com/articles/weekly_article/imperfect-sound-forever.htm
Probably...
...like many people, the reviewer expected more than than CP could deliver. I don't like Coldplay and have never done so. I like the catchy title-track, I admit. But even hiring a 'top-line' producer cannot hide the fact that Coldplay just cannot create the album that they are desperate to create. Neither will a few French-Revolution style jackets propel them into the position they are hoping to reach.
And Chris Martin is still an annoying twat.
gotta give it to the 'Play
at least they're trying to do something a bit different and "artistic", despite being resolutely mainstream. And any attempt by mainstream artists to do something adventurous whilst still going for the Tesco market is to be applauded, even if the delusions of grandeur are a bit pompous and misplaced.
But that's the point really - to expect something of Coldplay outside of their realms and to cut them down because of a perceived inability to compete with the sub-mainstream in terms of invention. Even though Eno is way past his prime in purely textural terms i'm sure he brings something to this record a little different from someone like Jacknife Lee. And Violet Hill sounds really quite unusual as a sonic piece when it comes on the radio, even though it's almost ruined by perhaps the most pedestrian guitar solo ever put to wax
Rock band version of Jack Vettriano
good call!
I have to say that
I've never been a fan of Coldplay right from the first time I saw them playing with Terris, and I don't expect this record to change my opinion.
you win at indie
hahaha
-
To be fair
I thought Terris were awful too!
you fail at indie !
Cheers!
De rien !
...
I saw Terris & Coldplay at Northampton Roadmender in about 1999; I thought Terris were ace and that Coldplay were boring. Terris, bar the debut EP, were pretty shite on record, though.
Manchester Roadhouse.
Aren't we all super-indie.
The Time Is Now EP
Made me never trust the NME again.
A lesson I should've learned sooner.
You misspelled 'ad nauseam'
I hafta believe most of the Coldplay hate stems from their popularity and personalities (though Martin seems pretty cool to me) because this is a pretty damn good record.
...
Blame the spell-checker on my Mac.
My fault.
a / u.
stupid vowels.
As long as Coldplay
are regarded as uncool by music journos, they will never make the classic that Chris Martin is desperate to create. X&Y was pretty poor admittedly, but you've gotta applaud them for at least trying to move away from their 'bland' stadium band image.
don't panic
see you soon
brothers and sisters
spies
warning sign
politik
a message
till kingdom come
"you've gotta appluad them..."
that's exactly what the reviewer did.
A very long review
which finally gives very few informations apart that Coldplay are a "big" band that sounds like a "big" band...
Lay the fuck off Jack Vettriano!
He's funny and I like him.
enjoyed this review
well written.
i really like coldplay. i don't listen to the radio or watch mtv so i'm not over exposed to them which helps i think.
Tolerable
As far as Coldplay albums go this one can actually be listened to all at once. I couldn't get through their previous albums without skipping a couple songs. A 6/10 is spot on.
this album is decent.
not shitty, but decent nonetheless. then again, you could say this about every coldplay album since parachutes. to me, parachutes remains their best album.
They bore me to tears...
...they really do.
I actually own all of their albums to date but I'm not sure why: I don't think I've listened to Parachutes or X&Y more than once. The latter was DULL.
I've certainly never had a "ooh, I feel like listening to a Coldplay album" moment. They just don't fit any given mood.
"music for people who don't like music"
- well put
^ I thought Robbie Williams held that title?!
pretty good review
certainly not their best yet, but they wont ever get better than this now.. i like three songs, the rest is very average
You lost me here:
"At one point on Coldplay's fourth album, Chris Martin, millionaire rockstar and male-bride of Oscar-winning Hollywood stalwart Gwyneth ‘homeopathy’ Paltrow, "
Review the fucking ALBUM.
Which I agree he goes on to have a crack at, but what a fucking pointless thing to put at the start. We all know this and have our opinions of it, but if wanted snidey comments about personalities I'd fucking read Heat.
I don't even like Coldplay and this annoyed me....
anyway....
no actually, this is a terrible review, I just re-read it. This has been written with pre-conceived ideas and opinions and absolutely no objectivity whatsoever. This can all be summed up by the line:
"music for people who don't like music"
You can say a lot about Coldplay but that's just inaccurate. Have you ever heard a Westlife album in its entirety? Until you have, you have no idea what "music for people who don't like music" even means.
oh and by the way:
"Gone are the days when you could identify a drummer by both his style of play and the sound of his kit, never mind being able to identify what model of guitar someone is playing from its tone."
Massive inaccurate generalisation ahoy!
It's pathetic
how worked up and pedantic some people can get with access to a computer and too much time on their hands.
...
This review is about 1,300 words long, which makes it about 500 words longer than the average album review on here.
EVERYONE in the world has pre-conceived ideas about Coldplay at this point, probably even including that Brazilian tribe that were photographed the other week trying to throw spears at a plane. I, in particular, have pre-conceived ideas about them because I've reviewed their previous two records, seen them live, owned every alum they've made, met Chris Martin and bought their debut single on 7" vinyl; reviewing it WITHOUT pre-conceived ideas would be a remarkable feat of magic, and utterly pointless. Objectivity is a nice idea but even scientists accept it doesn't exist.
I'd also wager that the audience (or target-market) for Coldplay crosses over rather largely with that for Westlife. What are you going to do about it?
Yeah I see what you're getting at.
But I still stand by what I said about the first line of the review. Its just pointless and slightly vindictive.
Oh, and about the Westlife thing. Seriously I had to listen to a whole album the other day. It actually kind of hurt, I felt exhausted by it.
"I'd also wager that the audience (or target-market) for Coldplay crosses over rather largely with that for Westlife. What are you going to do about it?"
What I meant by it was that Westlife's music is made as product to sell to people whereas regardless of what people think Coldplay do make music because they like making music, they've been making populist anthem music since they started, it just happened to get popular and is coincidentally good product to sell. Be that a good or a bad thing I don't know....
Anyway, I'm not being personal I just thought it was a shit review. And if that makes me pedantic, well damn, then that's what I am.
*makes note to send "well damn, that's what I am" to Chris Martin as a lyric proposal*
...
The first line is there, like any first line, to hook the reader and make them read it, whether that's because they agree of because they think I'm an asshole. Either way, I'm not that bothered, but it seems to have worked this time.
Re; Westlife vs Coldplay and the motivations for making music. The individual members of Westlife, when they went to audition to be in the band, wanted to be in a band and make music just as much as the individual members of Coldplay when they formed a band. They just went about it different ways. Coldplay are just as much about manufacturing product and shifting units as Westlife are - they're on EMI for god's sake! Guy Hands is banking his company's financial year on their success! If you think Coldplay are somehow pure of intention and free from the taint of late-capitalism then you're sadly deluded. You don't sign to EMI because you want to make music; you sign to EMI because you want to shift a gazillion units! Coldplay have just as big a backroom team as Westlife, probably bigger.
"If you think Coldplay are somehow pure of intention and free from the taint of late-capitalism then
Not in the slightest.
It's always difficult to suggest tone when you write on these things ain't it? I'm probably sounding more aggressive than I intend.
"You don't sign to EMI because you want to make music"
That's just as deluded, some bands sign to majors so they can afford to make music as well as shift units, which will mean they can carry on being able to afford making music. Remember Radiohead were on EMI until recently, yeah they left disgruntled, but they still signed and had a lot of good things to say about the people they worked with there. Besides I don't think anyone would describe Kid A as a radio friendly unit shifter....
But sure, you're right. Whatever. All bands signed to major labels are exactly the same. All of them.
But fuck it. We could probably go into a massive roundabout discussion about all of this so there's not really much point.
you're wrong, sorry, shut up and go away
Nah.
It was good review. Good balance of context, musical critique and opinion.
they're just a bit...wet
I hated HATED X&Y
and had absolutely no interest in seeing what they did next. But... I've had a nosy on the myspace streaming and yep, it's good. It's better than the last two by a long long way, if not quite brilliant. Review spot on.
i've never really understood
why X&Y gets beaten on so much- sure it wasn't a step forward for them or anything, but at the time got pretty good reviews all round and seemed to get a good response. I think Rush Of Blood is the best, and even though its the album that put them where they are now, it doesn't sound like an album that was deliberately written to make them a 'bland stadium rock band.'
Good review, want to hear the album.
...
even thought i knew this review would annoy me, i read it anyway. whats wrong with me?
Why does it annoy you?
WTF?
sorry mike,....
... thats not meant to be a critism of the review.
i root for the underdog. ironically, on dis, coldplay is the underdog.
the drummer in coldplay
doesn't represent an age where you can't tell one drummer from an other or whatever the review said. He is just a fucking boring player, albeit one who has been overproduced to fuck.
Jack Vettriano
is an excellent artist, and his work is hardly aimed at those who 'don't like art'. I feel this is a profoundly ignorant comment.
...
fwiw, my girlfriend is an art historian.
Wow.
Do you just rehash her opinions then?
...
When she's right, yes.
really?
Mr. Southall:
Your preconceived notions of this band have unfortunately tainted this review beyond all repair, making it a transparent and predictable chastising of Chris Martin and company.
Time and time again throughout the review, you return to your skewed talking points that are both remarkable and laughable.
Your use of "catchy but unremarkable melodies" begins your tour of ridiculous comments. Whether you are foolishly suggesting that crafting instantly likable melodies is child's play, or simply that you personally prefer more dissonant sounds, the phrase is utterly useless.
I don't think that I even need elaborate on your "music for people who don't like music sentiment" because it is patently absurd and clearly caters to the flocks of faux-elitists who cannot resist an easy target like Coldplay.
Then, framed by the fact that they stripped the opening track of its lyrics, and obsessed with the idea that Martin is "cripplingly" desperate for critical acceptance (raising both points multiple times) you go on to negatively characterize the band as making a "safe" attempt at radicalism.
The whole concept of "safe" is meaningless. If they stick to writing massive, soaring pop tunes, they're being safe. If they try to do something different, they're doing it in a safe way. That view is insulting because it again shows a fundamental disrespect for the art of songwriting. It also trivializes the band's understandable desire to retain their core characteristics (which you clearly despise, and condescendingly dismiss repeatedly) while experimenting just a bit.
What exactly would be "risky" for Coldplay? Releasing some avant garde, atonal sound collage? Expecting "genuine radicalism" (now *that* got a laugh out of me) from this band is missing the point entirely, and unfortunately you've based your entire review on that premise.
Lastly (in the interest of time) your shallow criticisms of the production values (i.e. the Pro Tools argument) epitomize your delusion. Eno's ability to craft shimmering wa