As their commercial star’s ascended, Icelandic quartet Sigur Rós’ critical stock appears to have fallen. Six years after their breakthrough (second) LP Ágætis byrjun wowed the music press in ’99, last album proper Takk… established the outfit as soundtrackers supreme, their songs beamed into the homes of millions nationwide on a weekly, if not daily, basis. Yet despite this increased profile, the album received a spread of lukewarm reviews, and its stopgap ‘follow-up’ Hvarf-Heim fared worse still, DiS seeing fit to only award it a 4/10 score.
Put simply, as Sigur Rós reached a wider audience, their original supporters were left feeling that the band wasn’t challenging itself especially. Takk… contained its fair share of blissfully ethereal moments, exploited superbly by the BBC, but it lacked the heart of 2002’s ( ), the last Sigur Rós album to attract as good as unanimous praise (DiS review here), that special something that had set this band out from the post-rock pack when ‘Svefn-g-englar’ enraptured so many teary admirers at the fading of the last millennium. Things have to have changed on their fifth LP, the mouthful-of-a-title Með suð í eyrum við spilum endalaust.
The album’s title translates as ‘with a buzz in our ears we play endlessly’: it’s not the most promising of introductions to a record that you hope won’t find its makers simply going about their business with nary a care for development; you want clear beginnings and endings, an experience that can be broken down into movements to cherish. Yet opener (and lead single) ‘Gobbledigook’ sets the pulse racing in a most unexpected fashion, coming on like Sigur Rós have been taking tips from Animal Collective. The percussion is pounding, that aching drone we’ve come to associate with the band absolutely absent. This is immediate, strikingly so; it’s a blindsiding move. And it’s all over only three minutes after it begins. It’s as far away from any ‘signature’ Sigur Rós sound as they could have strode without calling in Pendulum to collaborate on some rave beats.
A breezy, bustling beginning is successfully followed by the equally absorbing – for reasons you were never anticipating – ‘Inní mér syngur vitleysingur’, another song that’s speedy of pace, and really quite indie-pop of structure; it’s something that you could easily imagine an act like The Ruby Suns piecing together, mixing a slight otherworldliness with obvious motifs and memorable hooks. ‘Gooan daginn’ slows the pace at three of eleven, but still we’re in unexpected territories, listening to a band deliberately operating outside of their most comfortable zone, at least for a while.
It can’t last, but when Með suð í eyrum við spilum endalaust takes its eventual turn for the more traditional waters the band has sailed previously, it does so with grace; there’s no immediate 180, but rather a glide into sensuous tonal soundscapes. ‘Festival’ is gloriously seeped in melancholy, lingering sighs of guitar rising and falling beneath vocalist Jón Thor Birgisson’s alien-yet-affecting wails; somebody might have called this ‘whale music’ once, and when the singer’s on form like this it’s easy to understand why. While Icelandic dominates, for the first time Sigur Rós have penned a song in English, the closing ‘All Alright’. Its distant horns play engage in a slow dance as a high-mixed piano leaves breadcrumb trails for the listener to follow through the encroaching darkness. It’s not threatening, this pressing black; rather, it’s a lights-out to look forward to, to drift into without a care left in the world. This is the feeling that the last album failed to convey fully. To hear it again is a joy.
The middle section of Með suð í eyrum við spilum endalaust is where its longest tracks are to be found, and as such attentions can wander; after the comparative assault of the album’s opening brace, offerings like the tender ‘Ára Bátar’ seem rather without purpose. It’s one of a handful of songs that meander, quite delightfully, without any real urgency or direction, content to just be for the duration. In the right environment these will prove to be album highlights, but under the critical spotlight they’re a little too reliant on past glories to fully connect with tastes altered by the band’s adventures into risk-taking new territories. But do not mistake the above words to mean there’s filler of note to be found here – the only track that could be trimmed, if you really wanted to get those knives out, is a pleasantly forgettable instrumental buzz titled ‘Straumnes’, the album’s penultimate piece. Its inclusion isn’t puzzling as such – it is gorgeous – but it does rather lessen the impact of what would have otherwise been a tidy ten tracks of well-executed vocal-led performances from a band upping their ante at just the right time.
At the perfect time, actually: journalists are sure to find this fifth album a lot more conducive to critique-penning given its presentation of new ideas and potential directions for album six, and with festival season in their sights Sigur Rós have collected together a number of tracks that will be as happily at home experienced under burningly bright sunshine as they will the twinkle of a million distant stars. Once, this band were making music to stare skywards to, to contemplate the vastness of the universe we’re such a tiny part of; now they’ve discovered a hidden reserve of human spirit, sucked it in and produced a record that will reconnect their wealth of talents to listeners fearing they’d forgotten how they’d ever reached such a lofty pedestal. It’s great to have them back.
Surprised...
...after reading the review that it was only given a 7...
I like this
Not quite up there with 'Agaetis Byrjun' but better than '()' and 'Takk' in my opinion.
7/10's
very weird considering the bum love handed out in the review.
Can't wait to hear this.
^ Agreed
I really like the Gobbleligook single, and I don't really like Sigur Ros, y'know *foreigners* ...but I'm gonna buy this.
That is a bad album cover
surely Iceland is too cold.
The Back Cover
could be a lot more revealing.
This is being pretty harsh on Takk
which I still think is brilliant, if not as good as ( ).
Looking forward to this one.
Yeah 100% agree charlie
Takk was awesome and definitely better than (). Don't get me wrong () was good but it was quite repetitive. Takk was like ethereal pop (I knicked that from the Daily Telegraph before I start getting flamed)!
Agaetis is by far their best work so far although I agree with the reviewer that they've tried to do something quite different with this album. The thing that immediately strikes you is the use of acoustic guitars, Sigur Ros usually love everything electrical!
i
absolutely agree that takk was a better album. i don't really understand why ( ) gets all the glory and takk is like "the album that didn't live up to ( )".
ara batur is like a nuclear bomb of sonic justice
Needs better numbers
I would give it somewhere between and 8 and 9..
I agree with
cowcow. 8 or 9.
a nice review
but i would have given an 8 i think. i agre especially about the penultimate track.. good work
like all sigur rós albums after AB
i'm not listening to it until it's out and i can take my time with it.
in my humble opinion, ( ) wasn't as good as takk. i find takk very dreamy and ethereal, ( ) was just too emotionally heavy for repeated listens. especially in the middle of the album. although obviously, it has it's moments of pure sonic joy...
still, no doubt the new one will be better than Von.
Takk... was and still is fucking magnificent.
It was the band pulling out all the stops on their sound, creating something so overwhelming it was hard to take it all in at times. And the critical reviews reflected this.
Strangely enough, when ( ) was released, it was considered a cold, methodical release in the wake of Agaetis Byrjun, lacking the womb-like warmth of its predecessor it relied on repetition and atmosphere more than anything else. The reviews reflected this.
So really, what the hell is going on with A: The Sigur Ros backlash in the last year (that 4/10 Hvarf/Heim score was retarded and I commented on it back then) and B: the switcheroo of opinion between Takk... and ( )? It's baffling.
I love both, incidentally - ( ) *is* cold and repetitive, but so is Iceland, and the album sums up their home country for me beautifully. But the derision of Takk... due to its subsequent ubiquitousness (it's a lazy producer's instant epic score) is shameful.
Were Hoppipola
not the Planet Earth soundtrack, not on radio one daytime schedule. No backlash to Takk would exist. Different to ( ) yes, but how often are bands castigated for sticking to an identical formula? Takk was a beautiful album, retrospectively condemned due to its consequent popularity and 'overachievement' in the perception of the press.
Oh, and the new album is lovely and great too.
i'm amazed that someone would describe iceland
as "cold and repetitive".
it's windswept, gorgeous and full of spectacular contrasts.
siberia is cold. the midwest is repetitive. iceland is neither.
all sigur ros
= 9/10 out of 10
head and shoulders above their competition. 4/10 for hvarf/heim is a nonsense. as is 7/10 for this.
you mistakenly assume
I mean cold & repetitive in a negative sense.
Much of Iceland is a barren wasteland of cold, hard rock and nothing else.
I absolutely love that. ( ) is a testament to the austere nature of the land, where beauty is simplicity.
i assumed that you were trying to describe the nature of iceland,
not just the central highlands on iceland.
Laughable review
This is easily the weakest Sigur album, pales when compared to Ágætis Byrjun, ( ), Von and Takk. It's over produced, and the new poppier direction really doesn't suit there sound...still has some wonderful moments, so 6/10 for me.
I'll be interested to see what more specialist zines make of the album.
* their
obviously
More specialist zines?
That focus more exclusively on bands llike this?
The Silent Ballet
Now Like Photographs
They focus on instrumental music more than DiS, yes. (Yes, I know there's vocals, but Sigur influenced a lot of instrumental bands and used to have less vocals...)
like
Icelandic Post-Rock Weekly?
it's probably very likely
that someone would be able to fill out a magazine of exclusively post-rock icelandic bands
not heard this...
... yet but thought takk got a lot of unfair press, the whale music comment was funny but a bit harsh!
Saw the band at Glastonbury when they were plugging () thought they were very good.
What's wrong with Takk?
...and indeed, with Hvarf/Heim?
I found them both utterly compelling. I can concede as to why people may have been disillusioned with Hvarf/Heim on initial release, but now that it's available as a budget release (most places are selling it for about £5) the music can be listened to without the attached stigma of "what's the point?", and it's absolutely glorious.
And Takk. Takk! That was most definitely for me the single greatest release of 2005.
Surely with those quality bums on the front cover....
the album deserves at least 8/10. I've heard that's Chris Martin's buttocks on the front cover. My friend told me and he'd know cos he's got a beard.
i give it
8.5/10
best album so far this year, no doubt.