"Electronica" is a term that's become slightly tarnished by the swamping of the genre with music that could be better described as electronically created easily-listening. It's often seen as a bastardised offshoot of 90's "ambient" (and its ugly younger sibling, the horrible post-Morcheeba trip-hop hangover of the "chill-out" genre). The mention of electronica brings to mind rustling Carharrt and scruffy goatees, men in caps staring at Apple laptops onstage while the audience smoke, chat amongst themselves or sway along to the endless featureless beats. But electronic music is one of the few genres that has blossomed in a truly kaleidescopic way over the last decade - from the sleaze excesses of electroclash and the jarring broken-beats of Planet Mu and Rephlex (and the archipelagos of micro-labels around them), to the seminal drone and pulse of Boards of Canada, the sonic-magpie collages of The Books, the arty glitch-pop of Simon Bookish and Patrick Wolf and the postmodern remixes and re-readings of vv-m, 2 Many DJs and legions of faceless white-label bootleggers the world over.
This vast genre is a shifting, fickle, endless thing, lacking a strong discursive thread or central sound palette to hold things together in quite the same way as, say, indie-rock or whatever. And due to the proliferation of user-friendly and readily available recording software, everyone is at it - which, while great in some ways, also means you have to dig through interminable layers of dross to find the best stuff.
But sometimes, you find treasure. Nomad Junk is Capitol K's third album, and is perhaps the one that will finally catapult him into the same league as the Cubase abusers, pioneering chin-strokers and bespectacled aural scholars that have been pushing the envelope through the last two decades. From the outset, it fuses a cavalier experimentalism with fully-formed melodies and constantly evolving song structures. Each piece is draped in layers of samples and noise, organic instrumentation stacked against perfectly imperfect drum loops, record crackle seeping through banjo and synth, harmonies and spoken word running back and forth against the beautifully textured backing.
Nomad Junk skips around musically just as its song titles do geographically. Computery synth flexes over warm guitar and snatches of glitched vocal in Hong Kong; Taipei is a mind-bending, euphoric construction of hiss, crackle, warped vocals and percussive bass. The unspecificied Cosmopolis is described in squalls of synth over breakbeat decorated with Danelectro lead lines; Pan Continental is built around Spanish guitar piped through a digital South American filter.
So, nomadic as it may be, Capitol K has turned all the junk, samples, influences and ephemera into musical pearls, and cemented his own reputation in doing so - this is one of the finest albums of 2005.
"electronica"
...isn't a genre.
Basically, the first two paragraphs are complete rot.
But otherwise, fair enough.
...
This invariably seems to happen whenever something that isn't proper-indie-with-guitars-and-stuff is reveiwed here.
I just wish the readers were given a little more credit. If I've made it as far as reading a review of a Capitol K record, I probably don't need DiS to hold my hand and explain what 'electronica' is.
no win situation
you give some readers credit and then a whole bunch more will come back saying they don't understand cos you've not explained something enough.
what to do?
who to please?
you decide. obviously. you always do.
It's basically
Some thoughts I had on classification of the supposed genre of electronica, which are very relevant to the reading of tis album, and how it will be read by critics.
If you have problems with a reviewer expressing their thoughts, then... uummmm... write your own review? DiS allows you to do that now...
...
I actually agree with you and think it's fine to have a paragraph like that when it's something that the majority of readers (me included) probably won't be familiar with, but surely it's also fair for someone to COMMENT on the review in the COMMENTS section? Just because they disagree with you or have an issue with something doesn't mean you have to be all "ooh, you go write a better review then"
Yeah
I was drunk and I have a big mouth.
Or because it's a website, I guess... big fingers?
Also
I don't like carping.
I saw
Capitol K supporting Fridge at the beginning of 2002 and bought an album, Island Row, and 12', Pillow, on the strength of that. Both good and would be interested in hearing how this sounds compared to them.
Capitol K
I think obviously that constructive criticism has its place, particularly if you're going to write a review that will be read by loads of people.
Normally electronica/dance reviews are quite difficult. It's not like normally you can explore the lyrical content, or accurately describe what the songs sound like. Music is one of those arts where the best way to describe it is to compare it to other music, if you get what I mean in that rather overlong sentence.
About the first two paragraphs, I in particular don't know much about the electronica scene and the various sub-genres of it. So thanks JB*
*If JB is a good nickname?
hmmmm.........
i think that's a good review.
so what if it the first couple of paragraphs explain what electronica is? if you feel that you already know, cool. if not, well even better that someone's given a wee bit of an explanation.
it's just a review..........a piece of writing..........i think it reads well and the intro makes perfect sense in the context of the review.