Drowned in Sound

Search



ThinkTank100
1 vote
?
by Andrew Future
  • Type: Album
  • Release date: 05/05/2003
  • Label: Parlophone

If the genius of a guitarist is really measured in what they don’t play, then 'Think Tank' is Graham Coxon’s greatest work. After all the high profile fall outs (Albarn’s hair, and lifelong pal Graham have both departed), the band’s seventh LP is a genuine pleasure to behold.

It’s taken them a while to achieve it, but where 'Blur' and '13' were full of jump-start arrangements and fractured experimentalism, much of 'Think Tank' is lush in melody, flowing in windswept electronica with a myriad of bombastic orchestral backing one minute, before retracting into cocoons of melancholic and clustered acoustics the next.

Gorillaz has seemingly expelled most of Albarn’s desire to create simple, instant radio-pop, and thankfully 'Think Tank' is cheese free. There’s a clutch of wistfully confessional heartbreakers which bleed the same beauty as such favourites as ‘Bettlebum’ and ‘This Is A Low’. New single ‘Out Of Time’ is content to swoon around the string-laiden waves of its own longing beauty, but only reveals its full worth after repeated visits.
‘Good Song’ and ‘Sweet Song’, the album’s graceful standout, recount familiar Britpop themes of being lost in pop music and TV. The latter’s mild guitars and understated vocals luckily eschew Norman Cook’s regular production techniques in favour of a more technically satisfying country-led direction than on previous records.

They haven’t dispelled with guitars all together though. 'Think Tank'’s nod to MTV2 and the American market comes in the shape of ‘Crazy Beat’, (the album’s ‘Song 2’) and ‘We’ve Got A File On You’, a throwaway re-hash of ‘B.L.U.R.E.M.I.’.
Alex James and Dave Rowntree step out of their shadows as being solely ‘the fanciable one’ and ‘the alcoholic’ respectively with the classy funk moments of ‘Brothers And Sisters’ and hypnotic tribalism of ‘Moroccan Peoples Revolutionary Bowls Club’. The inevitable stench of Damon going through his Mali photo album doesn’t prove as gagging as Graham obviously found it.

When Coxon does finally appear, it’s on the mesmerising piano led finale ‘Battery In Your Leg’. The cosmic feedback of the dearly departed’s whirring guitars are a blissful complement to Damon’s vocals which you feel could crack at any moment.
A ballad that sounds like the old Blur playing something off 'OK Computer': it’s a tear-jerking conclusion that feels like a heart gently freezing and crumbling beyond the stars.

'Think Tank'’s greatest asset, aside of its ability to move you with its mature beauty, is Blur’s natural progression. An organic and emotional ride, it may show label mates Radiohead that you don’t necessarily need to try so hard to move on from your heyday and keep your appeal.

  • Blur 10 / 10
Words: Andrew Future

Blur - Think Tank

Blah! Personally I think their new stuff is awful, boring, monotonous i-dont-care-and-im-a-boring-twat shite. I was never a big Blur fan but at least they had the occasional tune. Now they seem to have just pushed themselves to new levels of crappyness. HOO. RAH!

And I'm not just saying this because I hate you either.

KPxx

Re: Blur - Think Tank

The very point of the new Blur LP is that they've moved on from making 'the occasional tune' to something with a lot more depth and wonder to it.

You hate me? Haha. Join the queue, princess. You sure you're not just PMSing?

Re: Blur - Think Tank

personally if i want depth and wonder i'll listen to mogwai, aereogramme, tool, oceansize, doves, the cocteau twins, stina nordenstam, isis, or any of the other bands out there who manage to produce Depth & Wonder™ with some verve, some panache, and some fucking beauty.

of course if i want some wouldbe "artistic" mumbly chinstroking noodling from a charmless bunch of characters whose illustrious leader sings like a [very] poor man's david bowie that very clearly just wants to be seen as the grand high magus of musoland, and whose records are about as far from the realm of "depth and wonder" as Count Grishnackh is from receiving an award to services to humanity, then i spose the new blur record'll be right up my street really.

x
gen

Re: Blur - Think Tank

"mumbly chinstroking noodling from a charmless bunch of characters" = any of the pretentious bands listed above that you'd "personally" listen to

blur are really touching because they're not afraid of sounding foolish or camp at times, nor of a good melody. damon's got 10x as much soul as say, the Doves.

Re: Blur - Think Tank

bollocks. everything i've heard from blur lately has sounded like they're more concerned with the impression they make and the reviews they get, than with actually expressing anything at all. their records are emotionless.

as for sounding foolish or camp - i sincerely wish they would, it'd make for more interesting listening. right now their music is colourless.

x
gen

Re: Blur - Think Tank

"Join the queue, princess"?

are you aware of how much of a cunt you sound?

Re: Blur - Think Tank

Yep, this definately is Andrew Ftture of brief NME fame. His comments smack of a 2nd rate music journo recently relegated from journalisms Premier League straight down to the Vauxhall Conference...

Re: Blur - Think Tank

Like Oceansize, Aereogramme or Mogwai, the new Blur LP requires more than just a quick listen, How many times have you listened to record before deciding it's colourless? (Listening to the single on XFM doesn't really count).

Oceansize might make a nice noise, but they're ultimately hideously dull to watch. Damon Albarn may be a bit too concerned with saving Africa, but at least he's got some kind of personality. It's pretty idicative of the way things are that no one's stepped to replace the likes of him. WHat's the lead singer from Oceansize called again? The only known figurehead we have now is Chris Fucking Martin, in his sweatshop made 'Free Trade' tshirts. Call Albran a camp Bowie rip-off, but everyone knows who he is. This counts for something. It's all so very easy to dis something just because it's popular. That unfortunately is the nature of much of this site, though.

Comparing Blur to Tool is utterly pointless. There may be a lot of depth behind Tool's records, but the main point of interest in Think Tank is the lush and simple melodies, and its achingly pure emotion. See also the new Durutti Column LP 'Someone Else's Party' and 'Rose' by Maximilian Hecker that Sean reviewed.

Re: Blur - Think Tank

Oceansize? Dull live?! The first time I saw Oceansize was supporting the Coopers at Sheffield Barfly. After standing outside in the cold and rain for over an hour as TCTC were late arriving and knowing full well that there wasnt a chance in hell I was gonna see their whole set before having to run for the train, I really wished to god that the band with the shit-sounding name who were on first would just not play. But they did, as everyone filtered through the doors shivering and wet I watched them and within about.. oohh 3 minutes I didn't give a shit that I was gonna miss TCTC or that was already starting sneezing 'cause I was too busy trying to pick my jaw up off the floor. Oceansize are one of the most enigmatic, enthrawling, utterly fucking beautiful live bands I have ever seen. Just because it's not some guy with an acoustic guitar droaning on about his lost love, doesn't mean it cant be heartfelt and beautiful. Oceansize have twice the technical talent and a million times the inspiration and imagination of most of the bands you blab on about.

Anyway, this isnt about you sneering at every band we champion and thinking your opinion is the voice of authority, as you always seem to. I am not "dissing" Albarn because he's "popular". Blur have had plenty of brilliant tracks and Coxon's a genious. Fact is, in their desperate plea to seem oh-so-more mature and like the wisened lords of pop/indie, they've forgotten to actually write and TUNES. Woopsie!

Anyway, don't you have your own website to be sounding off on?

KPxx

Re: Blur - Think Tank

You all take such a bitter tone to everything. It's music, try and enjoy it.

I like Oceansize as much as the next Biffy fan, but on Monday at the Underworld they were boring however, and the few people that were still there left.

If it's all about 'tunes' - humn us all an Oceansize song then.

If you want some cool, inspired new music that has nice tunes, pick up the King Geedorah LP. Alternative, cross-over hip hop.

Re: Blur - Think Tank

until monday i wasn't an oceansize fan at all - had seen them twice [in small and large venues] and could see the appeal but failed to understand the absolute love some people [kp :P :)] afford to this band. first two or three songs on monday seemed same-old-same-old... then something kicked in, and fuck knows what they changed, but it just started sounding immense and glorious - by the end of the set, gen = smitten.

i want to see them again.

the king geedorah track i heard last night didn't grab me particularly - reminded me of dj shadow but sounded a bit half-arsed. if the point you were making about blur was that the songs they make are accessible [judging by yr dismissal of the tool/blur comparison, i assume it was] and not "pretentious" [bollocks are they not..], venus hum make gorgeous, heartstopping and ridiculously accessible, hummable, memorable and addictive songs - and being as they're on a major, they might actually get some money ploughed into them, which would be nice. well worth checking out.

x
gen

Re: Blur - Think Tank

and mew!!!!! everyone must listen to mew!!! i forgot them on my 'Now That's What I Call Depth 'n' Wonder volume 39' list.

x
gen

Re: Blur - Think Tank

Mew are wonderous = agreed :)

Oceansize are just a band you have to REALLY listen to for the full effect I think. There's so much going on in their songs it's kinda sit-on-your-own-and-listen-and-get-lost-in-it kinda music.

KPxx

Re: Blur - Think Tank

Oceansize are sod all like Biffy Clyro. And after making snide comments about their new album on the way to Kerrang I don't know why you've suddenly decided to like them either.

Oceansize are not a pop band like Blur. They're really nothing alike. And yes they have tunes. They have big sweeping walls of swirling sound and delecate sparkling lulls in contrast. Their music is powerful and emotive - it makes me FEEL something. It takes the mind somewhere better. And to me, thats a large part of what music is.

Each to their own and everything, but I think Oceansize are far from boring. Unlike the new Blur stuff. And unlike your snotty, pretentious, condescending attitude.

KPxx

Re: Blur - Think Tank

I'm not a Biffy fan; the point was that having toured with Oceansize, many Biffy fans like Oceansize. I like Oceansize too, but I'm not about to go pull their lead guitarist or nuttin'.

The most 'radio friendly' of the King Geedorah stuff does sound a bit Shadowy, but like RJD2's debut LP, much of it is made up of really great beats, some sleek melodies and really cool samples.

Mew are fucking wondrous - sure to be a much better Coopers tour support than Oceansize and Biffy, eh?

Let's also hope Venus Hum don't get left on the BMG back benches.

Re: Blur - Think Tank

sadly i prolly shalln't get to see mew with the coopers, as it clashes with bridge and tunnel's first gig in AGES. i have my priorities. [and i ain't seen bridge and tunnel live for literally years.]

x
gen

Re: Blur - Think Tank

Mew are playing ULU too if you wanna come to that.

Re: Blur - Think Tank

this is very true. i might do. but then again i might go to brighton, cos excursions to brighton are always fun.

i'll think about it closer to the time.

x
gen

Re: Blur - Think Tank

Now this is funny. Petty squables between two people who are supposed to work for the same website is pure gold dust to read. Judging by DiS' announcement that they're starting a record label to go along with their tours, T-shirts and pin badges, they obviously have aspirations much higher than just this website. Some might say to be as big as NME, the very thing you constantly take (jealous) sideswipes at... Oh by the way, went through Matlock recently KP (is pretty much half way between mine and my girlfriends place). Will defo go back in the summer - those cable cars look soooo cool!!

Re: Blur - Think Tank

"Petty squables (sic) between two people who are supposed to work for the same website is pure gold dust to read".

If you work at the NME I'm sure you regard having anything to read as gold dust don't you? What with the NME now reduced to being a photo mag with interchangeable writers writing interchangeable puff-piece guff to accompany the pages and pages of interchangeable photos of interchangeable bands.

Re: Blur - Think Tank

"WEB SITE OF THE YEAR
www.drownedinsound.com
With NME spending so much time sucking Aussie ass and licking Detroit dick, DiS has officially become the only legit info source re: new Brit bands." - rollingstone.com

Re: Blur - Think Tank

Hahahahahahhaha

In one post you've encapsulated everything about how the UK music 'press' is still falling down the toilet, DIS vs NME, two 'organs' of varying useful/lessness: can you just fight each other to the (joint) death, while the scant good writer at each sneaks off unnoticed and unharmed (though frankly those scant few, by and large, write for & save their best work for other publications/sites at the moment, as it is)?

and Rolling Stone! Yeah!! They've had their finger on the fucking pulse since, oh....forever!!!

Re: Blur - Think Tank

! are you saying there's soemething wrong with pop?

Re: Blur - Think Tank

Number One Terris fan - you're just bitter that we gave Terris a big billing a few years back and they monumentally FAILED to live up to this hype.

Re: Blur - Think Tank

Terris, another great NME hyping. Anyone remember when they played ULU with Coldplay? Co-headline!

Who are you anyway Mr NME Freelancer?

Haven't NME got rid of all the writers they used to have, instead its now written by the same uninformed twats who read it. Don't see Swells there any more. NME reads like a styless cross between heat and a student paper, without any passion or grit in the writing and without anything interesting to really say.

How many new bands have you gone out and found dare I ask?

Don't NME freelancers just have to follow slave style to their pyramid system? The one with the Strokes at the top and the datsuns underneath.

THis is the same NME that cares so much about good new music its saying it wont cover any bands featured in Bang or X-Ray. Kerrang got the Darkness first, ever wondered why you've never seen em in there?

The White Stripes doing the same thing for four albums hardly counts as 'new music' does it?

And the comment about DIS people arguing is bullshit too; do you seriously reckon everyone at NME sucks off the Vines/Libertines like particular individuals?

Re: Blur - Think Tank

"Haven't NME got rid of all the writers they used to have, instead its now written by the same uninformed twats who read it. Don't see Swells there any more. NME reads like a styless cross between heat and a student paper, without any passion or grit in the writing and without anything interesting to really say"

The dead wood is long gone. Swells was monotanously "controversial"
and never seemed to like the music he was covering. Anyone around the age of forty (hello Mr Sutherland) should be working for a youth orientated magazine, thus thats why NME has seen an influx of new writing talent recently. As for the bands we cover - ok, Kerrang got The Darkness, but who brought you The Strokes, The Hives, The Stripes, The Vines way before anyone else?

Re: Blur - Think Tank

Sorry that should read: Anyone around the age of forty (hello Mr Sutherland) SHOULDN'T be working for a youth orientated magazine, thus thats why NME has seen an influx of new writing talent recently. Where are those subs when you need em eh?

Re: Blur - Think Tank

Personally I read about the Stripes in one of the monthly mags way before they were in nme.

Re: Blur - Think Tank

NME weren't first with the Stripes as for the others, of course they're gonna be first when they are the ones 'creating' these acts.

WHo are you then Mr Freelancer?

The fact remains though, that people don't care about those bands. Their just fads. When they're no longer cool, the NME won't cover them. They haven' written any songs that will last beyond their 'moment of cool'. It's indie disco music at best, and that's the point.

People long for the hey day of the mid-nineties because the indie stuff that the Maker and NME covered wan't just 'cool' it was actually good. People bought it (literally) because it was real. Who's actually bought a fucking Libertines record? Who gives a flying fuck about seeing the Vines bloke 'smash' his guitar into a bunch of emptu Marshall stacks.

NME is far too concerned about having a rigid structure of what is 'cool' - (the Pyramid Strcuture is well known), writing about complete nonsense ('Liam Farts Onstage', 'Vines Bloke Drunk On Stage') and focusing on the same few bands to really grasp the same credibility which made it what it is.

Swells aside, the NME, save writers like Louis Pattison, Beaumont and James Oldham, is boring as fuck to read. The whole set up needs a major rethink, or the last remaining establishment of the British music press will continue to wheeze and slowly die.

Let's hope IPC's record company owndership part with the Melody Maker brand, and maybe that can be revived.

Re: Blur - Think Tank

I do agree that NME has gone down hill since we got Conor in as Editor, and this is the general concencus of most of the staff, some of whom have left the office to go freelance or quit completely. With rising tensions between staff, sales on the slide and the best writing talent heading for the exit door, the NME office is no longer a happy office...

Re: Blur - Think Tank

NME have a tendancy to be wankers to the people who make it good. How many people who have previously been affiliated with the NME have a good word to say about it? Its days as a necessity are limited. They need to get rid of the clueless Muzik boy, stop this tireless fasion lapping, build back some bridges and get a fucking clue.

Re: Blur - Think Tank

The NME was always controversial, people have been saying that it covers the wrong bands etc. for ever and ever amen.
BUT recently, it has actually become just plain shit. There's literally nothing to read in there.
The NME didn't bring us The Stripes. I'd heard of them back in 2000 when De Stijl cam out (check out the pennyblackmusic.com reviews archives and it's there). They didn't BRING us the strokes - that was a combination of NME, MTV2, Lamacq's show and Mojo.

Out of my friends, the hard-core music fans don't read NME, the fashionable trend followers do sometimes but ignore it, the rockier - cooler people read Kerrang! and Rock Sound. The NME's audience is really based around one group, beer boys who want to find out the latest news on Oasis and who moan about 'fuckin' manufactured pop bands clogging up the charts'. A paper for those types of people is never going to be for me. sorry

oh, yeah, havent heard the blur album. my brother really likes it!

Re: Blur - Think Tank

If you're going to use my name to post messages, at least have the good grace to spell consensus properly. "Concencus"? Jesus.....

Re: Blur - Think Tank

Frankly, I don't think anyone really believed that you were TRYING to lose ur job!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: Blur - Think Tank

I wasn't trying to lose my job, I just shouldn't have gone online whilst drunk and typed all that stuff - I mean I even spelt concencus wrong! I love Conor McNicholas really!

Re: Blur - Think Tank

You rip into the Vines, Strokes etc - and then you go and complement JAMES OLDHAM?!?
(Starsailor's manager or something similar, lest we forget, back at the time when NME were hyping them up as the next big whatevers, printing huge gushing page-long reviews of them of his own, etc...)
And Mark Beaumont??? That feeble wannabe Swells, easily as at home at Melody Maker in its vile last days as anyone there was?

Oh, dear. Dick

Re: Blur - Think Tank

Couldn't disagree with you more about James Oldham. He had a cool, unique, writing style, and is definately a man going places in the industry with his Loog Records label.

Re: Blur - Think Tank

Dur? Why hype them if they were a steaming crock of shit? And do you not think the name "#1 Terris fan" is actually meant to be ironic?

Re: Blur - Think Tank

"They have big sweeping walls of swirling sound and delecate sparkling lulls in contrast"

shut UP!

what is this thread about
just everyone go home

Biffy are always going to be where they are now
They'll probably never even sell out the Astoria

Re: Blur - Think Tank

Hoo fucking ray, someone has some goddamn sense.

The sooner you guys drop with all the meaningless descriptions and get a reality check on these shit indie bands that offer fuck all to the rock starved masses of Miss England the better we'll all be.

Long suffer Biffy Clitoris.

Re: Blur - Think Tank

Gotta agree with all the detractors... 'Out Of Time' is growing on me heavily, but I listened to the first half of the album and had to stop. Something about Damon embracing world music and all that just grates.

Sure, his solo output might be hit and miss, but Graham always kicked Damon's pretentious art school side into touch.

Re: Blur - Think Tank

the album is soul-less. Graham prob pissed his pants after hearing it.

Re: Blur - Think Tank

Terris, Oceansize, Starsailor, most of the bands with "The" in front of the name, they're all MOR nobodies, inventions of the NME. Blur have TUNES, Blur have IMAGINATION and as a result Blur have LONGEVITY. Quite simply, no UK band (with the possible exception of Radiohead) in the last decade can touch them...

Re: Blur - Think Tank

i think its cool, although my fave album will always be blur. its nice to see a band evolve a bit for a change. and coxon does some crackin solo stuff. i can just imagine him riding round on his skateboard now......

Re: Blur - Think Tank

....oh and radiohead have been a bit pants since they did kid a. bring back heavy sweating!!!!


(no i havent got a clue either)

Re: Blur - Think Tank

If NME invented Oceansize then maybe they should start bloody writing about them eh?

Re: Blur - Think Tank

biffy clyro, oceansize, blah, makes no difference, all nobodies, flash in the pans in comparison to blur.

Re: Blur - Think Tank

blur were also a flash in the pan then on their 1st or 2nd album too then
blur were nobodies as well then

nice one John D

Re: Blur - Think Tank

the difference is that on their 7th album blur are still relevant, still interesting, still being discussed. if any of these bands make it to 7th albums, nobody will care, and nobody will be listening apart from their mums.

Re: Blur - Think Tank

either you're really that stupid or you're a soothsayer of sorts

Blur - Think Tank

Dont really care either way on Blur, just curious as this is the first review Ive seen thats nice about it...

Re: Blur - Think Tank

when "out of time" came out the consensus was, blown it. then people began to hear the record for themselves and we had some revisionism and everyone i know who's heard the record likes it.

and i've seen a 4* and a 5* review so far? which magazines do YOU read?

Think Tank

I've heard this now and quite like it. After the blub fest that was '13' I honestly thought I'd never give them the time of day again, but 'Think Tank' is really nice. Flowing and assured. It's their 'We Love Life' and, as such, will throw off the class of '95 Britpop forever mob, but it's a really accomplished mid/late career album.

I'm glad Coxon's gone as well. I know Albarn's a grade A twat but that joyless snob really did my head in.

NME

This thread definitely needs digging up. Who of the current NME writing crop do DiSers rate? Who's the worst?

Re: NME

sarah dempster is q funny but dubious taste...
piers martin good
tony naylor enthusiastic
the rest generally dull trend followers
except for me
i am an arse

Re: NME

Hey leave Beaumont alone. Great writer. As are the following:
Tim Jonze
Dan Martin
James Jam
Rick Martin
Pat Long.

I'm never wrong, trust me.

Re: NME

Fruity thinks this should be on top of the comments board.

If there was any recompense for the fish...

I'm still giggling at a review that can use the phrase 'classy funk moments'. I see yards of white nylon and polyester suits, bass solos, Level 42 sneaking back from whatever abyss they happened to find themselves aurally fornicating in...

‘Concencus’ sounds like some Latin American variation of the cucumber (look at those lovely pips). NME’s been going down the dumper for a long time, moving to Toronto gives me an even bigger excuse not to buy it, being that it’s three or four quid here in Mooseland. It’s even shitter than Rolling Stone which is saying something. RS is a fucking joke, self-congratulating itself for being so ‘left-wing and radical’ and then plastering every cover with some young blonde nymphets (witness in the last six issues the Olsen Twins, Britney and Jessica Simpson). The Britney article in particular was slavering, some shot of her oiled up with a suggestive finger sliding down her panties that should have been headlined ‘She wants your cum boys’. Is it possible to be left-wing and degrading to women at the same time? Of course it is and Jann Wenner’s crew do it with style and consummate élan. At least NME hasn’t gone down that track yet. I felt it went for the spurious young angle way too much, the official IPC site blurb about ‘making its readers feel fashionable’ rather typified that. It’s called ‘restriction of audience’, the UK singles market does that by focusing on younger schmunger types and look how fucked that is.

Who needs magazines anyway? There’s a shitload of websites out there offering reviews. Crucially there’s a load of band sites offering you tracks to listen to and come to your own concencus (sic).

Incidentally, I see Malik Meer is now Features Editor. Look at that CV…

“Malik has extensive journalistic and editing experience and has worked across a host of leading mens’ music and style titles including The Face, Arena, I-D, Loaded and Smash Hits. He was also former commissioning features editor on Ministry Magazine and acting music and news editor on Mixmag, prior to taking over as editor of IPC’s dance title, Muzik. Since the closure of Muzik in June this year, Malik has been working on development projects internally for IPC.

Malik says: “NME is without a doubt the best music magazine on the market today and I am thrilled that I can now be a part of such a dynamic editorial team. I’ve got loads of ideas that I can’t wait to put into practice, which I know NME readers will love.”

Conor adds: “Malik’s rock music credentials are top-notch. He’s the final piece in the new NME editorial line-up and confirms the magazine as having the best editorial team of any modern music title in the country.”

(from the beautiful IPC website)

Is Conor going to get a whole battalion of little danceniks from fucked magazines in there? Malik’s credentials for ‘rock music’ are top notch courtesy of working for Mixmag, Ministry and Muzik? No more so than mine are top-notch through working for Stillwater Trout Angler magazine.