Drowned in Sound

Search

Home > Community > Music forum

In a fight, The Stones or The Beatles??

no votes
? by shotkey
Who would win in a street brawl the stones or the beatles?

With the following line ups
Beatles - Paul, John, Ringo, Paul
Stones - Mick, Keith, Jones, Watts
shotkey | 22 Jan '04, 20:10 | Send note | Report this | Reply

Re: In a fight, The Stones or The Beatles??

John would be too busy sitting in a bed with Yoko to be much good. The Stones would win.
CaviarAndCigarets | 22 Jan '04, 20:44 | Send note | Report this | Reply

Re: In a fight, The Stones or The Beatles??

I undoubtedly think that the beatles would win. due to their apparant ability to clone their bassist..


unless there really were two pauls... the current one, and the one who died back in the sixties, maybe?
ImageChange | 23 Jan '04, 01:48 | Send note | Report this | Reply

Re: In a fight, The Stones or The Beatles??


C'mon, years of drugs couldn't down Keith. What chance do you think a few moptop Scousers would have? Stones all the way.

On a slightly different sideline, how would you like to see McCartney tortured? Are you in favour of thumbscrews, a bag of rats over the head or the full testicle/water/car battery treatment?
DrFurry | 23 Jan '04, 02:50 | Send note | Report this | Reply

Re: In a fight, The Stones or The Beatles??

Originally I was thinking the Stones, but then it was pointed out to me that the Stones consist of a bunch of middle-class lads some of which attended university (I.E mick at L.S.E). I think much like a cooler version (with infinatley more talent) of coldplay.

Where as the beatles are all from working class families, brought up on council estates (not that I'm predudice), but this is bound to mean that they are harder. Going deeper into this Stuart Sutcliffe died from a brain hemorage days after he was involved in a fight with John Lennon, where Lennon kicked him in the head. That is to say that Lennon utimately murdered Sutcliffe..FACT. Also I am sure that Lennon killed somebody else like a promoter or DJ that bad mouthed the beatles. It was those winkle-picker boots that he use to wear, get caught in the skull with one of those and its..OUCH goodnight Viena!

So when everybody thought that Lennon was in bed with Yoko showing two fingered peace signs to the world he was in fact showing off his body count. "Thats right I killed two people now I'm in bed with my bitch AND I'm on T.V so fuck y'all" is what he was over heard saying, however it had to be edited out.

Apparently Mark Chapman got to hear of this statement and saw Lennon as a mysoginistic murdering gangster not fit to live in his country. Therefore he decided to take Lennons life in a hit.

McCartney...it has to be both thumb screws and the rats on the face. We all remember "The Frog Chorus" and we never forgive.
shotkey | 23 Jan '04, 10:33 | Send note | Report this | Reply

Re: In a fight, The Stones or The Beatles??

Have none of you seen Keef Richards smash that stage-invading fan round the face with his guitar?! The Stones would clearly win!

Saying that it depends if The Beatles could get George Harrison's wife involved - when that intruder invaded their house and stabbed George she cracked a lamp over the attackers head knocking him unconscious...
Old_Anonymous_Comments | 23 Jan '04, 10:59 | Send note | Report this | Reply

Re: In a fight, The Stones or The Beatles??

i always wanted to shoot him in the gut and see how long it'd take him to die, while he begged for medical assitance. How we'd laugh....
Old_Anonymous_Comments | 26 Jan '04, 23:34 | Send note | Report this | Reply

Re: In a fight, The Stones or The Beatles??

Well, The beatles

Jagger is a fucking poof. Watts too sensible. Jones too dopey. All the job would be left to Keef!!!

Whereas...the Beatles were scousers, from some really shitty areas. Lennon would be up for a fight easily, the others not that much, but they would certainly help him.

YOu know, back then, in teh 60s, Keef wasn't that tough yet, anyway...he had yet to mix with his jamaican brothers and get a few tips about being a gun-totting hustla.
Old_Anonymous_Comments | 23 Jan '04, 11:47 | Send note | Report this | Reply

Re: In a fight, The Stones or The Beatles??

I reckon John and Ringo were the fighters and Keef was the only fighter in the stones, mind you Brian.... who knows...

my money's on the beatles.
half_egg | 23 Jan '04, 13:30 | Send note | Report this | Reply

Re: In a fight, The Stones or The Beatles??

blatantly the stones.

the beatles were peaceful lads, sitting around with flowers round their necks playing sitars, singing about peace.

the stones have drunk, inhaled, injected and swallowed enough shyte for a small country in their time, and still manage to gig without zimmer frames.

Old_Anonymous_Comments | 23 Jan '04, 14:10 | Send note | Report this | Reply

Re: In a fight, The Stones or The Beatles??

BEATLES!!!!!

Stones were wasters man, Beatles were scousers, they would knock 7 shades of shit out of the stones.
surfwax_america | 23 Jan '04, 14:29 | Send note | Report this | Reply

Re: In a fight, The Stones or The Beatles??

'the stones have drunk, inhaled, injected and swallowed enough shyte for a small country in their time, and still manage to gig without zimmer frames.'

so have the beatles.
i would go for the stones though, as they have a pirate on their side, john would be the only fighter in the beatles. also ringo would be easy to distract, offer him a 5-8 years old jigsaw and hed be occupied for hours.

stones all the way, would be a good fight mind
easy_rob | 23 Jan '04, 15:55 | Send note | Report this | Reply

Re: In a fight, The Stones or The Beatles??

keith would share out his blood to the rest of the stones and then they'd never fucking day. So stones it is...
Old_Anonymous_Comments | 27 Jan '04, 01:15 | Send note | Report this | Reply

Re: In a fight, The Stones or The Beatles??

1. Ringo is not a fighter. Does the voice that narrated Thomas The Tank Engine sound like a common streetfighter?

2. McCartney's clearly no fighter.

3. George was too nice to do anything like that.

4. Lennon would have fought. He'd have fought like a boar in a sack, probably as dirty as they came when it came to the sly knee in the testicles. I still fancy Keith to take him. Any punches to Mick's face would be nullified as the assailant's fist would bounce back off of those enormous lips.

5. At Altamont, a man got murdered during the Stone's set. The worst that ever happened at Beatles gigs were damp pairs of female underwear and perhaps the odd Thermos flask being dropped.

Stones all the way.
DrFurry | 28 Jan '04, 04:19 | Send note | Report this | Reply

Re: In a fight, The Stones or The Beatles??

Early sixties: Beatles (Trained in the arts of street brawling during their Hamburg tour, Stones were fops and dandies peddling very watered down blues)

Late sixties: Stones (Beatles wispified by collosal drug intake, Stones galvaised like the hull of a ship (except for Brian...))

But The Who would kill all nine of them put together
Old_Anonymous_Comments | 28 Jan '04, 14:03 | Send note | Report this | Reply

Re: In a fight, The Stones or The Beatles??

Beatles. Although the scouse council estate theory means fuck all here. I mean, the Liverpool of old is nothing compared to the Liverpool of now. Also, lennon was brought up in a semi on a leafy street...not on an estate. and he didn't kill Sutcliffe, a bunch of russian sailors did, although the facts of this statement are shrowded in mystery. fuck the stones, one punch and Jagger would be sprawled in a bloody, camp middle class mess across the floor. drugs or no drugs, Richards probably couldn't see straight enough to land a punch and the rest of them don't count as they are by law ignored in any stones beatles debate. in that respect it's a simple case of numbers - there are four beatles, there are only two stones. ding ding!
revolver | 28 Jan '04, 18:19 | Send note | Report this | Reply

Re: In a fight, The Stones or The Beatles??

O.K., this is a hard one! I think that it would be the Stones for this reason: The Stones have done enough drugs to support a small country! And if that didn't kill them nothing will. I wonder if Keith has to get a blood transfusion every week to stay alive, and, if that doesn't kill him than The Beatles have no chance of winning the fight because the transfusions should have killed him!
articia | 8 Feb '04, 22:18 | Send note | Report this | Reply

Re: In a fight, The Stones or The Beatles??

You Give Love A Bad Name Lyrics

An angel's smile is what you sell
You promise me heaven, then put me through hell
Chains of love got a hold on me
When passion's a prison, you can't break free
You're a loaded gun
There's nowhere to run
No one can save me
The damage is done

(chorus)
Shot through the heart
And you're to blame
You give love a bad name
I play my part and you play your game
You give love a bad name
You give love a bad name

Paint your smile on your lips
Blood red nails on your fingertips
A school boy's dream, you act so shy
Your very first kiss was your first kiss goodbye

You're a loaded gun
There's nowhere to run
No one can save me
The damage is done

(chorus)

publishing :



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you find some error in You Give Love A Bad Name Lyrics,
would you please submit your corrections to me? Thank You.

Bananarama - You Give Love A Bad Name Lyrics related links:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Shortcut to part of Bananarama Albums


Bananarama Album - Bananarama Lyrics
Bananarama Album - Bunch of Hits Lyrics
Bananarama Album - Deep Sea Skiving Lyrics
Bananarama Album - Exotica Lyrics
Bananarama Album - Greatest Hits Collection Lyrics

All Bananarama Albums...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Shortcut to part of Bananarama Lyrics


Bananarama - It Ain't What You Do Lyrics

Bananarama - Keep Your Hands To Yourself Lyrics

Bananarama - King of the Jungle Lyrics

Bananarama - Last Thing On My Mind Lyrics

Bananarama - Let It Be Lyrics

Bananarama - Let Me Love You One Lyrics

Bananarama - Link Lyrics

Bananarama - Live Now Lyrics

Bananarama - Long Train Running Lyrics

Bananarama - Love Generation Lyrics

Bananarama - Love in the First Degree Lyrics

Bananarama - Love, Leave, Forget Lyrics

Bananarama - Love, Truth and Honesty Lyrics

Bananarama - Maybe the Next Time Lyrics

Bananarama - Megalomaniac Lyrics

Bananarama - Michael Row The Boat Ashore Lyrics

Bananarama - Middle Of Nowhere Lyrics

Bananarama - More More More Lyrics

Bananarama - More Than Physical Lyrics

Bananarama - Movin' On Lyrics

Bananarama - Mr Sleaze Lyrics

Bananarama - Na Na Hey Hey Kiss Him Goodbye Lyrics

Bananarama - Nathan Jones Lyrics

Bananarama - No Feelings Lyrics

Bananarama - Nothing Lasts Forever Lyrics

Bananarama - Once in a Lifetime Lyrics

Bananarama - One In A Million Lyrics

Bananarama - Only Time Will Tell Lyrics

Bananarama - Only Your Love Lyrics

Bananarama - Outta Sight Lyrics

Bananarama - Preacher Man Lyrics

Bananarama - Preacher Man [Ramabanana Alternative Mix] Lyrics

Bananarama - Promised Land Lyrics

Bananarama - Prove Your Love Lyrics

Bananarama - Push! Lyrics

Bananarama - Ready or Not Lyrics

Bananarama - Really Saying Something Lyrics

Bananarama - Rhythm of Life Lyrics

Bananarama - Riskin' A Romance Lyrics

Bananarama - Robert de Niro's Waiting Lyrics

Bananarama - Rough Justice Lyrics

Bananarama - Scarlett Lyrics

Bananarama - Set On You Lyrics

Bananarama - Shy Boy Lyrics

Bananarama - Sleep Lyrics

Bananarama - Solid Gold, Easy Action Lyrics

Bananarama - Some Girls [12" Version] Lyrics

Bananarama - Starz Lyrics

Bananarama - State I'm In Lyrics

Bananarama - Strike It Rich [12" Version] Lyrics

Old_Anonymous_Comments | 16 Feb '04, 17:11 | Send note | Report this | Reply


© DrownedinSound.com | From the Archive - The Tuesday DiScussion: MySpace or MyFarce?