Martin: No, you drove us here.*
And so, appears the first new work from The Strokes in almost a year, but frankly, it seems like forever.
Back with something between a bang and a cheery wave, ’12:51’ is a smart piece of brevity that goes someway to microcosmically indicating the forthcoming ‘Room On Fire’; similar, whilst at the same time commendably evolved. All the familiar hallmarks are there, from the angular new-wave cool to Julian Casablanca’s down-the-telephone vocals. What it does offer however, is the assurance that despite working in a fairly confined area of music, The Strokes are clever enough to push it to its limits and find constantly new, contorted ways of re-inventing the same wheel. Smart.
* The opening quote comes from, of course, the quintessentially cool film Grosse Point Blank. If it doesn’t quite work as intro to a Strokes review, well, that doesn’t matter. It’s Grosse Point Blank, and it’s probably their favourite film.
the album
Re: the album
Re: the album
Re: the album
strokes are new conspiracy
You don't even say *why* it sounds different, do you? The sentance which starts "What it does offer however..." is completely circular - it just says it sounds new because it sounds new. You can't justify a statement by just restating it! Unless you have a really cool voice - but even this ploy doesn't work through the media of written text, obviously.
Re: strokes are new conspiracy
Re: strokes are new conspiracy
Re: strokes are new conspiracy
It'e the strokes but a little bit different.
It's a Strokes song It's a Strokes song It's a Strokes song It's a Strokes song It's a Strokes song It's a Strokes song It's a Strokes song It's a Strokes song It's a Strokes song It's a Strokes song It's a Strokes song It's a Strokes song It's a Strokes song It's a Strokes song It's a Strokes song It's a Strokes song
How hard is that to grasp?
jaunty. casio. new wave. strokes. mid tempo. grower.
assymetrical.
alright?
sheesh. And are you telling me that there's someone who cares about the strokes who hasn't actually heard the thing yet?
Retro futurism?
Seriously...
This song just sounds like The Cars, but that's never a bad thing. There are REM-y bits on the new album too, which is a bit weird.
Strokes: sound like Buzzcocks?
Surely some other of the five people that will read this mus recognise this glaringly obvious fact?
Re: Strokes: sound like Buzzcocks?
You can see that they may have been infulenced by The Buzzcocks at some point or other.
But it's not the most obvious of influences.
At least, that's what I think.
Re: Strokes: sound like Buzzcocks?
Re: Strokes: sound like Buzzcocks?
As I've already said, each to their own, but....
If The Strokes sound like The Buzzcocks then TATU are the new Megadeth, Westlife are My Bloody Valentine's successful pseudonym and Britney Spears is actually Shirley Manson with blonde highlights.
Both bands may have originally been influenced by the same scene (New York circa 1976) but whereas one took those ideas away and created their own identity, the others are merely a better looking New York Dolls tribute act with rich mummies and daddies.
Dom G.
Re: Strokes: sound like Buzzcocks?
New York Dolls?
12:51 in Electro already..?
absurd...
by Dj Dsico or someone?
http://4trak.net/dsico/archives/000304.html
Re: 12:51 in Electro already..?
Re: 12:51 in Electro already..?
http://www.gelbartmusic.com/lonesomes/
(in the audio page)
Strokes = Pugwall
I only just noticed this morning.
Wierd...
Orange Organics were kick ass.