Drowned in Sound

Search



Strokes Room on Fire 150x150
1 vote
?
by Neil Robertson
  • Type: Album
  • Release date: 20/10/2003
  • Label: Rough Trade

A pile of prozac with your name on them. A job that eats your life; gives you nightmares and makes you waste your days in stale-smelling offices with paper walls. Relationships made of complaints and excuses; couples who can't love each other but can't live apart, and proceed to tear chunks from themselves 'till there's nothing left. A life that wanders on autopilot, until one day someone asks what you have to show for it, and all you can find is a puddle of debt, some so-called friends and a drinking problem. Then you realise that something's got to change.

Pop music is the art of feeling weightless. It's about shaking yourself free of the burden, the obligation, the ball-and-chain boredom of modern life. About how three-chords and a melody can make the bad stuff seem less real. Less powerful. Less likely to swallow you up. It's made for drunken dancing, slurred singing, being with your friends and enjoying life despite what it does to you.

But why The Strokes? Why should you let a group of arty, rich-boy prep-school posers force their hyped-up, rip-off rock on you? Surely they're just a bad joke; a style-mag stunt; a group of trust-fund delinquents who dropped into music to avoid working on Wall Street. If they don’t 'get' your pain, what chance do they have of making it better?

"I'm not your friend. I never was."

It's true that 'Room on Fire' doesn't deserve the hype it's been lumbered with; judged alongside the wealth of bold, boundary-breaking albums released this year, The Strokes' second sounds like a timid, attention-seeking gimmick based on lightweight tunes and a good record collection. But albums should never be judged solely on what else is out there, and those with the knives out are ignoring one inescapable fact: their songs are fantastic.

Bursting from the blocks with a 'Flashdance' bassline, yapping guitars and Julian's playboy sneer, 'What Ever Happened?' reminds us what we've been missing; the coke-addict energy; the drop-out chic; the sheer life-sick cynicism that emanates from his Lou Reed ramblings. Everything that made the world fall for 'Is This It' not only remains in its successor; it shines even brighter.

The proof is in the swooning white-reggae of 'Automatic Stop,' the mod-ish 'give-a-shit' stomp of 'I Can't Win,' and the stage-trashing, spite-spewing put-downs of 'You Talk Way Too Much;' this isn't the sound of a band departing from their debut; but one who've refined their songs into the kind of perfect sleaze-pop missives we were always promised.

The joyous, jagged romp-pop of '12.51' is a case in point; an arsenal of nagging guitar lines that mimic Casablancas’ nursery-rhyme melody before Fab's drumkit explodes into a giddy mess of trashed high-hats and Blondie-esque brilliance. Then there's the plodding street-swagger of 'Between Love and Hate,' which meanders harmlessly before a fantastic, out-of-nowhere chorus line arrives, transforming it into a piece of stadium-swelling wonder.

But the undoubted highlight here is the astounding 'Under Control;' a gorgeous silk-clad slow-dance of Sam Cooke soul, with Casablancas' rasps of despair and regret adding real emotional weight to the shoulder-shrugging nonchalance we've been used to. While the lyrics still amount to 'Fear and Loathing in East-Side Apartments,' the down-the-line directness of words such as 'I just want to watch you go by' add a sincerity that make his songs all the more believable.

Sure, lots of people will hate it, and those sad, pallid indiesnobs who creep around crappy Camden pubs lamenting the demise of Mansun will certainly find it hard to take. But we'll let them argue amongst themselves. In truth, if you can recognize its limitations and understand that far better records have been made this year, then it's possible to enjoy 'Room On Fire' for what it really is; an adrenaline-fuelled head-rush of precision-perfect pop tunes about modern life – about sex and cynicism, love, despair and the art of feeling weightless.

"I'm not your friend. I never was."

The Strokes don't 'get' your pain. But they will make it better.

  • The Strokes 9 / 10
Words: Neil Robertson

fantastic

that's the mark i would've given it too.
it's becoming a horribly addictive album.
help.

Re: fantastic

i ain't heard the album but the single is shite. i think they're one of the most overrated bands ever. apart from maybe the vines. or kings of leon.

Re: fantastic

Your comment was as about as original as the sound of all 3 of those bands.

You crashing bore.

Re: fantastic

i always use to think the strokes were overrated but i am able to tolerate them even when the massive xposure they receive. From this i come to the conclusion that i dont mind them, even if they were a bit wank at reading.

Re: fantastic

Indeed... The Strokes are dismissed as overrated so often these days that they're actually in danger of becoming underrated. In any case, calling them 'overrated' is a criticism of the media and the public, not the band.

Personally, I like The Strokes, because I happen to enjoy listening to their records. Fancy that.

Re: fantastic

pah. 'underrated', jesus, now i fucking wish..
fair point with who that criticism applies to though

doesnt change the fact that theyre so woefully mediocre the majority of the time. that's my problem with them (well one of the main ones), hacks' hyperbolic droolings just exasserbate the whole situation further. and christ, anyway, if mediocrity was what i wanted then i'd be happy as a pig in shit with some of the stuff currently around, especially with reminders of the strokes' supposed 'genius' thrust in my face with nauseating regularity for the past 2 and a half years now, ever since the days after that static, chronically boring Brats show down the bill at the astoria

im not gonna stop you listening to yr strokes records tho :) but i aint holding my tongue..

Re: fantastic

everything is derivative in some way...even prefuse 73.

The actual problem some people have with the strokes is in admitting they like something populist. The fact is it's a great album - insidious and addictive.

There are much better bands out there but there's no denying it's great the strokes are around. Bands like this encourage people to go looking for music.

Re: fantastic

I would love to know the names of all these bands that are better than the strokes, you and the reviewer seem keen to let us know while you enjoy the strokes there is much better stuff around...like what?

Re: fantastic

if everyone rates the strokes using your user profiles and other bands they like you'll all get recommendations - tho it would be easier for people to just say who, but we got the technology...

Re: fantastic

better albums released this year (in my opinion): 'You Forgot it in People' by the Broken Social Scene, 'The Violet Hour' by The Clientele, 'Feast of Wire' by Calexico, 'Cold Water Songs' by The Broken Family Band, 'This is Our Punk Rock' by Silver Mt. Zion and maybe 'Cast of Thousands' by Elbow - though I'm not sure yet.

there are possibly others, but i couldn't tell you without staring at my record collection. none of those are as fun as 'Room on Fire' though...

Re: fantastic

how about....the divine brown, the dirty, the gin palace, etc..etc...and these are only in london..

c'mon!

1st of all, please nevermind my poor english, it's just my second language, okay?
but this is a really good album, hell yeah, but i also agree strokes are seriously overrated, and so is this album. nme is almost gonna have sex with these guys. i mean, they were fucking awesome when they started with is this it, 'coz before them it looked like that if you wanted to listen to rock music, if you were a fan, it was just better to be complacent with it. the strokes changed it and - at least for me - rock became interesting again. so i started to find others bands, way much better than 'em. there are lots of bands that are just better than them, but i think we all agree that strokes opened their doors. just for this fact they have my respect, and i do enjoy them. the hype is too much for them, but i don't think we can just deny that they are a really really good band. room on fire is a great record, is this it was really 'it', no matter how much i preffer hellacopters, the libertines, the hiss or d4.

Re: c'mon!

hey dude--your english is better than that of many people who comment on this site, so don't worry about it! This:

"before them it looked like that if you wanted to listen to rock music, if you were a fan, it was just better to be complacent with it. the strokes changed it and - at least for me - rock became interesting again."

is one of the best comments I've heard about a band in a LONG time. I don't particularly like the strokes--but that was a great way to express how you feel about them. :)

Re: c'mon!

hey, thank you mate.

Somethingroundbrownandchocolatey

It's simply boring. When Supergrass released 'In It For The Money', NME gave them a kicking for slowing down the pace of their songs. Now they and everyone else are praising the Strokes for this new LP? I've had it for a week and a half now and it leaves me totally unmoved. I don't hate it, I don't love it, I don't kiss it and I don't swear at it. The first album was fantastic in the same way the first Oasis album was fantastic: shit that wasn't 100% new but had a new energy stuffed into it. Like Oasis, the Strokes have gone slower on the second album and the energy level has gone down appreciatively. The vocals are the same but the music has no life to it, it's uninspired and sounds like NYC by painting book numbers. A big, big disappointment. I'm onto my third copy of Is This It after two drinking/wall damage incidents and I'd buy it again if I trashed my latest copy. The choice this month was limited to the new Strokes LP or getting Plush's last opus imported. Julian et al - 0, Liam Hayes - 1.

see...

See, I hated the first album (well, not hated, but wasn't mad on). It felt to be almost trying too hard to not try at all.

This one at least has some melody that doesnt need you to be obsessed with the smell of mothballs to love. The worst you can be is indifferent to it surely? I'd agree with that mark 100%, for once!

Inconsistent

It's well written as ever, but something you make reference to more than once is the fact there are 'many' better albums and more 'genre defying' records out this year. So how does it get 4.5?

The Strokes are masters of illusion. They've sold two million records, but that's not a massive amount when you look at the hype they've had and consider that international artists like 50 Cent who've been around in the mainstream for half that time have done 5 times that.

It's pop music, true, in the same way that Oasis, The Smiths, Velvets, Buzzcocks or Beatles were. But the difference is they're time defying bands whose records will live on. Do any of you seriously think you'll be singing the likes of 'Reptillia' come 2005?

Re: Inconsistent

i said that there are many better albums released this year, and that the record has limitations firstly because it's true, and secondly to try and put the hype around the strokes in some kind of perspective. however, i also said in the review that you can't simply judge an album according to what else has been released. if you took that to its logical end, then had 'Room on Fire' been released in 1999, when there was fuck-all about except Gay Dad, Stereophonics and Catatonia, it would probably have been called the 'best album since Revolver,' and the band would've been hailed as messiahs - two statements that are obviously bullshit.

so what i tried to do with the review was isolate it from all the crap that was surrounding it, and judge it on its own merits as a truly great guitar-pop record. and on that basis, it deserves the mark i gave.

thanks for the comments though

unoriginal yet definitive

the strokes are by no means original.
even nme have addmitted they could have stepped out of the garage rock scene back in the 70's.

but they have changed the rock scene and defined and captured a certain mood that many people are obviously sympathising with.

personally id rather hear rehashed retro than nu-metal.
its like a generation has decided to re-interpret what they heard as kids.

but good things will come to those who wait.....

in a time so fucked in bullshit politics....there will be a band that will change the world again ...big style.....i have faith

roll deep

Re: unoriginal yet definitive

hell yeah - i'd much rather hear the Roll Deep lp when it comes out than waste another half hour of my life giving a strokes lp the time of day ;)

Addled clumpings from gates anew


It's very simple to separate the album from the hype. All you do is take it home, slip on some headphones and listen to it for the sheer fun of listening to music. The shitty element is that it isn't fun to listen to. If the record has limitations, surely the major limitation is that none of the songs are even close to those on Is This It. How can it be held up as being 'truly great' in one breath and then 'not the best album released this year' in the next? C’mon, give us the names of the albums that are better than this 'truly great' new Strokes ouevre for any record that is better than a truly great record must be covered in golden showers of magical brilliance semen ejaculated by the great god Genius himself and probably has the ability to induce orgasm on first aural content.

"In truth, if you can recognize its limitations and understand that far better records have been made this year, then it's possible to enjoy 'Room On Fire' for what it really is; an adrenaline-fuelled head-rush of precision-perfect pop tunes about modern life – about sex and cynicism, love, despair and the art of feeling weightless."

Making allowances for it? What sort of pisspoor standard is that? Sit around, make allowances for the fact that it's nowhere near as good as the first LP (we're not talking one more bad song, we're talking releasing a follow-up album that doesn't rank halfway to the first) and then praise it? Why not just write 'Well, I'll just let them release any old crap and make allowances for releasing that bilious filth?' And quit the idea that the Strokes write about modern life as if they’re orators of history. They’re residents of NYC and America, both having been hit hard by upheaval and conflict, both socially and politically, the shadows of 9/11 still out there, a right wing cad in charge of the White House, and all you can release is an album of songs about fucking, love and cynicism that don’t come anywhere near to your first effort? I don’t want some deep Radiohead rant about politics, I don’t want to sit down for two hours and listen to some whiny neurotic spad arcing onwards but the effect is as retarded as a band singing songs about the wonder of the summer of love right now.

As for there being fuck all good out in 1999... using the ever-convenient NME critics poll for that year, shall we mention some albums that were either very popular or, in the case of Mr Wayne Coyne and others, simply fantastic?

The Flaming Lips – The Soft Bulletin
Shack – HMS Fable
Super Furry Animals – Guerrilla
The Charlatans – Us And Us Only
Leftfield – Rhythm And Stealth
Gorky’s Zygotic Mynci – Spanish Dance Troupe
...And You Will Know Us By The Trail of Dead... Madonna

Travis' 'The Man Who' also sold a fair bit...

I really wanted to like Room On Fire. I’ve been waiting patiently for it. I moved from London to Toronto in February and saw firsthand that the cool kids around Toronto were slating the Strokes, all the fashionable kids were placing other bands higher that sounded way inferior. Fuck knows how many drunken arguments I’ve had in this city over the Strokes. Now I’m in the position of disappointment and waiting for the fingers to point and say ‘We told you they were shit’. The sad thing is that, with regard to Room on Fire, I can only agree with them. The Stooges got better with each album. Television’s second album is barely known but is at least as good as Marquee Moon. Here’s hoping that the third Strokes LP brings them back to former glories.




Re: Addled clumpings from gates anew

errm....where exactly in the review did i say 'making allowances?' i didn't, did i? you made that up didn't you? what kind of piss-poor standard is that? what i did say was that if you get over the fact that it is derivative and musically limited (and many things with just two guitars and a rhythm section are these days), then there's nothing stopping you from enjoying it as a collection of great pop songs.

if you're going to form an argument, please don't quote me out of context to make it stand up. i said that 'Room on Fire' was a 'truly great guitar-pop record;' thrilling, fun and enjoyable, yet ultimately limited and disposeable. I did not say that it's a 'truly great' record like the Velvet's debut or 'Strangeways, Here We Come,' or whatever else.

also, i'm not a musical historian; i used the example of 1999 to point out that it is foolhardy to judge a record solely on the basis of what else is around at that time. records have to be judged on their own merits, and that's what i did with 'Room on Fire.' you can disaggree with that approach if you like, but it's a bit late now, isn't it? oh and by the way, out of that list, only 'The Soft Bulletin is even worth mentioning...

if you don't like 'Room on Fire,' then that's fine; I've already written a perfectly adequate review stating why I think it's great, and i'm not going to keep treading over old ground because i've moved on. however, misquoting and misunderstanding things i've said in that review just to help your argument doesn't make you right... it makes you seem ignorant.

Bring it on Sherlock

For the record, I wasn't quoting you but raising a question with the allowances, hence allowances not being enclosed by brackets and having a question mark at the end of it. Not just me misunderstanding things, yes? But let’s go further…

"In truth, if you can recognize its limitations and understand that far better records have been made this year, then it's possible to enjoy 'Room On Fire' for what it really is… "

Now then, how is that not making allowances? Recognize its limitations, understand that better records have been made this year... and only then you might think it’s great? How is that not making an allowance for it? Once you’ve done that, you can give it 4/5 out of 5 because it’s quite good if you ignore their better stuff and just take it as an plain old album. Lawksamercy, this record reviewing is simple isn't it? If you do take it as a plain old album then it’s fine. If The Strokes were unknown and had just surfaced out of a dark puddle in Cambridge and presented this to the world then it’s a good record. But they didn’t. They’ve come into the world with a fabulous debut single, played some incendiary gigs, released a brilliant album and have had the music to go with the image. We waited, we expected and they come back with this? An album that critics have not damned but do use words like ‘derivative’, ‘slower’, ‘musically limited’… Oasis followed the first two albums with utter pish and got blasted for it. The Strokes seem to be getting an easier ticket.

You keep using this word ‘great’ in conjunction with this album. Is it going out of fashion? A ‘truly great’ album is apparently a masterpiece but a ‘truly great guitar pop album’ is not a masterpiece? Is ‘Strangeways..’ not a truly great guitar pop album? By you saying that, it seems like you’re demeaning guitar pop as something disposable and forgettable. Room on Fire is ‘thrilling, fun and enjoyable, yet ultimately limited and disposeable’… something so great should never be disposable, it should make you want to have more and more of it, like the first album. Disposable indicates it’s easy to throw away and forget about it. Hardly the hallmark of a great record, yes?

So I haven’t misquoted you. Nope. I haven’t misunderstood you, there were no essays about Descartes’ Third Meditation in there. I don’t even disagree with your view. If you love the album then I’m happy for you, I don’t wish to change your view or encourage you to burn your copy. That’s nonsensical. But it seems like people are almost afraid to bitch this record out and you’re one of those people. Giving it credits like ‘derivative’ and ‘limited’ is a major problem. I’ve seen other reviews you’ve done and I liked them, especially the A Silver Mount Zion review. It seems curious to praise them, bands with a real sound of their own, and then give the Strokes the same number of stars whilst damning them with the derivative-limited agenda.



Disagreed somewhat

I think Room on Fire is great. While many things the Strokes do with their music seem derivative, the end product is a thing of its own. I'm sorry, but no band sounds like the Strokes. I'd put them in my top 10 bands in the world right now in terms of great making records (2 for 2). Let me know which album(s) this year are better than this one, cuz I ain't found them.

Compared to "Is This It?", the band has improved in almost every way. The songs are at least as catchy - there are more potential singles here than in "Is This It?". There are a lot of new sounds. And for any of those people that have really listened to "Is This it?" many times and know it well, you can't deny that it's a noticeble change, and a step forward.

What I disagree with the most is the notion that basic guitar-bass-drums bands might be limited or automatically derivative. And I can't believe the reviewer feels like he has to apologize for liking it:

"In truth, if you can recognize its limitations and understand that far better records have been made this year, then it's possible to enjoy 'Room On Fire' for what it really is..."

What? "far better records"??? WTF? Why the disclaimer man? Have some balls.

Re: Disagreed somewhat

This year has been mostly disappointing I'd say. But try:

Arab Strap's "Monday at the Hug and Pint"
Explosions in the Sky's "The Earth is Not a Cold Dead Place"

Delightful.

Re: Disagreed somewhat

disappointing, wha? ohh, come on...!! deadly albums from LFO, lightning bolt, blur, four tet, jeffrey lewis, Remarc, broken social scene, spiritualized, chris clark, the blood brothers, manitoba, tomahawk, the hells, the kills, venetian snares, dizzee, dirty 3....
and they're just a few things off the top of my head, and just albums. + the new missy and kelis ones arent even out yet...

I'm assuming neil's list of far better records included these and more and just got far too long when he thought about it and had to edit it out.......

Re: Disagreed somewhat

i'd mostly go along with that (except venetian snares, who is on a mission to destroy my head), there's also some wonderful records by Herman Dune, M83, Calexico, Goldcard, Royal City, Tes, The Shins, The Postal Service, Silver Mt Zion...

Re: Disagreed somewhat

i'll have to confess to not knowing many of the bands that you list .... but if you like manitoba and the hells then i know that i certainly can't trust you.
music has never been worse.

Re: Disagreed somewhat

hmmm... the hells i have no opinion about either way, but manitoba's 'up in flames' is wonderful. you're right though... you certainly can't trust me...

Re: Disagreed somewhat

I said MOSTLY didn't I?

I guess I was referring to expecting particiular albums to be great and they turn out to be mediocre-poor in my opinion. e.g. Room on Fire, Hail to the Thief, Happy Songs For Happy People....

Maybe I should check out some stuff on your list!

Mediocre

Finally succumbed to the hype at the weekend and bought the Strokes album - I've given it 4 plays and, with one or two exceptions, can find nothing here of any interest whatsover. Wall to wall mediocrity which, despite their claims to be perfectionists, sounds like nothing much more than what was swept from the cutting room floor after the first album - average musicians peddling average tunes in a joyless, plodding fashion with Casablancas' weak and increasingly irritating drawl over the top. So why so much hype? - because they are image-concious pretty boys who fitted the zeitgeist and because payola lives in many forms. If they are responsible for a raft of more challenging and innovative guitar bands subsequently coming through then we owe them our thanks but they should enjoy their barely-merited extended stay in the limelight whilst it lasts. In the meantime if you want your guitar bands to be innovative, passionate, tuneful, inspiring, articulate, musically-gifted, and not distracted by hype, image and a need to cosy up to every rock journalist in sight, then check out the criminally ignored Six by Seven before it's too late.

Re: Mediocre

can find nothing here of any interest whatsover

Thank you

come ON...

its crap! aside from the first two tracks the album is a trudging and overwrought mess! Half the songs are just inexcusable filler, tuneless and running the motions... I thought The Strokes were supposed to be this inventive band? instead the songs finish as they begun with very little change inbetween... I can't understand where all this praise is coming from, quite frankly the album gives me a headache!


I recommend every take a look at The Fiery Furnace's "Gallowsbird's Bark"... now theres expert songcraft and a highly tuneful album that isn't grating on the ears! and HEY, you don't even have to pretend to like because its "trendy"...

Re: come ON...

Finally succumbed to the hype at the weekend and bought the Strokes album - I've given it 4 plays and, with one or two exceptions, can find nothing here of any interest whatsover. Wall to wall mediocrity which, despite their claims to be perfectionists, sounds like nothing much more than what was swept from the cutting room floor after the first album - average musicians peddling average tunes in a joyless, plodding fashion with Casablancas' weak and increasingly irritating drawl over the top. So why so much hype? - because they are image-concious pretty boys who fitted the zeitgeist and because payola lives in many forms. If they are responsible for a raft of more challenging and innovative guitar bands subsequently coming through then we owe them our thanks but they should enjoy their barely-merited extended stay in the limelight whilst it lasts. In the meantime if you want your guitar bands to be innovative, passionate, tuneful, inspiring, articulate, musically-gifted, and not distracted by hype, image and a need to cosy up to every rock journalist in sight, then check out the criminally ignored Six by Seven before it's too late.

Re: come ON...

...were doing soooo well until you mentioned Six By Seven...

Re: come ON...

Please attach your ears and reconsider this comment

Re: come ON...

okay... let's for the sake of argument say that The Strokes are 'average musicians peddling average tunes in a joyless, plodding fashion'... that makes Six By Seven what exactly? A 'fireball of psycho-phonic fury and genre-bending, embittered brilliance?' Don't...think so.

put it this way, they weren't atop of my list when i was talking about how there'd be better albums released this year, but each to their own...

Re: come ON...

Neil R with you not being a disciple of SixBySeven perhaps you're the wrong person to ask but here goes anyway.You may (or may not) know that a recent Sixby Seven gig in London Town was recently postponed and is to be rescheduled for December,however the Strokes are also playing the smoke in the same month.What would you do if you had tickets for both gigs and they both happened to occur on the same night?Which band would be honoured by your presence?
Please enlighten me!

Re: come ON...

errrm... which do you prefer the most; 'The Way I Feel Today' and the latest 6x7 single, or 'Room On Fire?' Bands always have the habit of playing mostly new material.. so if you think the new 6x7 stuff is dodgy, then you're better off going to the strokes. however, you would make *a lot* of money by selling your strokes tickets....

Re: come ON...

I actually like Room on Fire.

On first listen I was really disappointed and thought it was a poor.

I've now listened to it a few times and am liking it more and more as the melodies seep into my brain. And the melodies keep returning to me when I'm doing the most mundane and unusal things. To me, it really shows the sound of a band who are under massive pressure and the songs feel very sorrowful to me - sort of like the sound of a band trying really hard to match the hype they've had heaped on them. Of course, this is an impossible task and J Casablancas has turned out some really sad songs here I think.

I'm seeing it as kind of a Pinkerton type effect (although admittedly, I thought Pinkerton was genius upon first listen).

Basically I say persevere with this one and the rewards are there in a different way.

Easypeasyflingling

Simple: flog the ticket to the Strokes gig for a hundred quid minimum.

Odd theory: could the reason that Room on Fire hasn't gotten one slating in any major review I've seen actually be because it isn't as pop as the first effort and, as most reviewers are white males who understand the joy of searching for limited release of 40 singles on pink vinyl, the indier than thou element enjoys Room on Fire much more because it is less straightforward? I mention this after reading the review in Toronto's 'eye' newspaper (free every Thursday, very arty) where the reviewer claimed that the stint the Strokes had with Guided by Voices as their tour partners has had an effect:"...while the band's Guided by Voices mentorship has taught Casablancas how to really nail a teary, beery chorus..."

Now I have nothing against Guided by Voices, they're decent in their own way despite frequent claims from certain fields that they are some of the most genius songwriters on the planet, and three of their albums sits in my cupboard o' music. But christ, comparing the Strokes to GBV?!? Compare Christina Aguilera to Sepultura and I'll get back to you. What sort of person thinks 'Hurrah. the Strokes now sound a bit more like Guided by Voices'? Indier-than-thou in excelsis. Selah.

http://eye.net/eye/issue/issue_10.23.03/music/ondisc.html

Re: Easypeasyflingling

Playlouder got it spot on: http://www.playlouder.com/review/+roomonfire/

Guardian too: http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/reviews/story/0,11712,1064268,00.html


and I think Blender gave it an average review...

these people obviously made up their minds after hearing the album

Re: Easypeasyflingling

yeah, 'cos i'd actually written my review before i'd heard the album. in fact, i'd written it before i even heard of the strokes. it's been stored in formaldehyde and kept underground for the past five years, waiting for an occasion such as this...

and as for the playlouder review... well, i'm pretty sure you can't trust anything that concludes by including the words "this isn't it." it sounds like it was created in a primary school pun factory...

Re: Easypeasyflingling

oh HAH AHAHAH AHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHa.... does that make you feel better?

as for playlouder, they appear to be one of the only sites to actually stand up and criticise The Strokes... because in all, Room On Fire isn't that grand, its not going to be remembered for much because the tunes simply aren't there! simple as...

oh and at least PL manage to be consistent with reviews, instead of this place where you are consistently off the mark and give people albums to review who are obviously unqualified to do so...

Re: Easypeasyflingling

y'know... i feel strangely cleansed after that little rant.

listen...there's nothing wrong at all with people criticising 'Room On Fire;' it's what happens when people have opinions. but it's one thing making an intelligent case against the record (see the posts above by Dr Furry), and another thing to pass off a clumsy, ill-informed hodgepodge of misdirected cynicism as a competent review - something Playlouder seem to have done with their article. i'm not saying that makes mine a glowing example of cultural criticism (because to be honest, i've written better), but at least, no matter how odious you may think my opinions are, i'm able to back them up...

oh, and yes, Drowned In Sound's reviews may be inconsistent, but that's because they're written by honest individuals and not a team of like-minded indie clones...

i'm feeling even better now. drunken rants are almost better than prozac. almost...