Drowned in Sound

Search



Album art is dead - Agree or disagree ?

no votes
?
by yes_

CDs and MP3s own the market these days, and there seem to be no more "classic" album covers that will be remembered forever (Pnik floyd etc). Is album art dead forever ?
I thought about this after seeing the new red hot chili peppers album cover. You would think that with being one of the most popular bands on the planet they would put a little effort into their cds.
Veiws ?

yes_ | 21 May '06, 15:51 | Send note | Report this | Reply

I'm impressed

by Tool's album cover


Call me an old fogie...

but i really don't see how the whole data-only-music thing will last in its current state. There's no lifestyle or image to buy into. I'm sure people said that when cassette art was so much smaller than LPs but i just feel like there has to be a backlash. It all seems so faceless and lacking humanity.


Fucking A Tool's cover is wicked

Tool have always tried to accompany their music with good artwork, and 10000 Day's artwork is a master stroke.

And remember The Wildhearts' PHUQ album (come on, it was 1996, I was young, drunk and impressionable by radio 1's rock show): purple velvet.

Or Thriller: Jacko with a lion cub.

Spinal Tap's album cover was awesome.

Smell the Glove.


Definitely Disagree

There's always been good and bad album covers and that won't change. I've not seen the RHCP album but there's always been lousy album covers and great ones.

To me this is just as infuriating as someone arguing that music these days isn't as good in the sixties or whichever decade you care to choose whilst forgetting that the only music you remember from that time is the good stuff and the mediocre songs (or in this case albium covers) get forgotten.


.

No, silly.

http://www.neptunerecords.com/images/covers/1625/6171.jpg

As long as 4AD and v23 exist, there will always be excellent album artwork around.

http://www.beggarsgroup.ca/1980forward.jpg


Most certainely not

I don't even have to justify myself.


Nahhhhh.

I love good album art. I like it when its pretty to look at. A lot of bands still do nice work with their covers. Most recent likings:

Highly Evolved
Transatlanticism
The Libertines


Ok a lot of disagrees

but what about mp3s ? people are buying them more than cds. Have people forgotten the joys of getting a cd or vinyl, taking it out and playing it for the first time ? Or should that statement only apply to the tesco music buyers ?


I refer to my previous reply

he he now that it's actually relevant. oops


I doubt it will ever come to a stage

where MP3s are all there is. If bands care about artwork etc they'll still release CDs. There's a similair trend with some bands and vinyl.


Well

I don't think the legally buying Mp3s will last, people still want a physical product at the end of the day.

And the prospect of a physical product as lovely as this makes me salivate:

http://www.burnttoastvinyl.com/new/releases/btv063.html


The thing is...

Album downloads are still pretty low compared to physical sales. It's true that People download singles and album tracks but most people still prefer to by a physical album.


Are you sure

people are buying more MP3's than CD's??

I think we'll always have people who don't use computers, so they'll want something physical they can have music on.

There is a huge gap in the quality of MP3 and CD too.


Album art is dead! Books are dead! Newspapers are dead!

Guitars are dead! Skateboarding is dead! Cars are dead! Food is dead! We're all going to have computers implanted in our minds and live in a virtual-reality World where music is made by waving your fingers through beams of light and all everyone needs to survive is just one protein pill a day! In space!

NEXT WEEK: WAR AND DISEASES


I like a good album cover

but I think it's pretty insignificant point if we lose them or not really. Sure, there's a lot of iconic album covers and stuff, but what has it got to do with the music anyway?

Surely one of the good points about downloading is that you don't have any preconceptions of an artist. You download a song by a band you've heard mentioned, and you've never seen them or how they want to try and sell themselves, you just judge them or music alone, which is a good thing.


...

*on


I think it's good

not to have preconceptions sometimes (especially when first hearing new music) but i think people are too hard on image and ethos being taken hand in hand with the music. Of course 'style over content' is bad but i don't think there's anything wrong with acts standing for something more than the sound they make.


LPs are better because they are bigger

The problem is that many CD covers are designed as if the picture/art-work is going to be big rather than specifically designing something for the size of a CD.


I think

there is something in that - maybe bands were more inclined to see artwork as more important when it was definitely going to be used as a satisfyingly-sized LP cover - covers like the Velvet Underground/Andy Warhol Banana, the Rolling Stones' 'Sticky Fingers' (with working zip), 'Sgt. Pepper...', Dark Side Of The Moon' and the classic 12" gatefold sleeve of Kingmaker's 'The Killjoy Was Here EP' (featuring a big dinosaur holding a ghetto blaster) make more sense when you consider they were devised as self-importantly large works of art.

At the same time, these are exceptions - before the demise of the LP, most albums still had shit or unremarkable covers, and since downloads became more widely used there've still been really good ones - 'Up The Bracket' was a fantastic sleeve, and the last dEUS album had a satisfyingly well-constructed booklet. If you look away from the corporate indie/emo whores, the indie underground are still producing classic cover art - Bullet Union's 'Ruin's Domino' and 'Doesn't Make You Punk' by Volunteers are my two favourites of recent times. The problem is that as the corporations run riot, flying the Shockwaves-sponsored flag of "alternativeTM cool", as more and more independent record stores close, as EVERY aspect of the rock scene becomes more and more corporate, as the select few "indie" bands are elevated to the Untouchable status of ROCK STAR, packing out the Astoria literally seconds after playing their first ever gig, the designers move in with their pre-determined notions of COOL and all the big releases we're allowed to hear about have uninspired, useless covers that band clearly haven't had a say in or given a fuck about.

Things are changing, though. At the moment, we're in a strange mix of 1991 and 1996. The music World's over-run with over-styled useless corporate slags, we're all fucked off with it, but we've BEEN HERE BEFORE, a million times, and something ALWAYS HAPPENS when you least expect it. You see little things happening, even just round London - Popular Workshop tearing up a clothes shop on a Saturday afternoon, Comanechi reducing Metro to a stunned silence, Komakino tearing the Barfly a new arsehole on a rainy Thursday in Camden. Drownedinsound was founded in a bedroom in Weymouth, for fuck's sakes, and now it's the British equivalent of Sub Pop, launching incredible bands that NO-ONE in the corporate World would have given the time of day to. The fact that we're here on this website debating is a testament to the incredible power of DIY rocknroll.

I'm fucked off, you're fucked off, we're all fucked off. This is the time when better things happen, when all our fuckedoffedness consolidates and we do something about it. I feel honoured to be part of these times. O, glorious indie scene! Let's go! Let's have it! Let's fuck!


Indeed.

To quote the Constellation records 'Mission Statement':

We won't overproduve or cheapen or conspire against the survival of the physical record album - that tangible, tactile object that contains real musical fidelity and artwork and little mysteries and messages tha you can look at and run your hands over and thing about before you turn off the lights and listen.

The Internet and the TV and the mobile screens and the glossy magazines deliver their icons, infobites, compressions and virtual communities. We embrace another set of utopic principles: that physical communities are fed by modest and simple resources it takes to make small amounts of stuff with many hands; that DIY means valuing the labour of artists and srtisans, printers and printmakers, scribllers in their zines, youngsters in their silkscreening shed and old-timers in their dusty shops - not the labour of lawyers and content managers and marketeers and lifestyle trendspotters; that punk-rock means having an analysis, working for a sustainable culture of resistance, critique and celebration, and drawing some lines.

In these latest, darkest, falsest, fakest, emptiest, easiest, escapist time, lets try harder to reclaim the real promise of punk-rock: help plant gardens in empty spaces, stop tossing coins at the jetset hipster lottery, and turn away from starfucking-whitelight-overexposure, the "just-wanna-get-my-music-heard-by-as-many people-as-possible" rationalisations, the carnival of product placement and tastemaking tomfoolery. If we can't do this, as children of privilege with our electrified guitar and smartypants ears and faraway wars, then our sad, confused generation can say we laid right down and let it all happen. Let's not, OK?


My God...

...they sound sanctimonious! ;)


I don't think so.

I think that's lovely.


Not sanctimonious.

Aware that the record industry is as infected by the fetid stench lowest common denominator capitalism as the rest of society, and prepared to do something about it. And thats something that as music fans we should applaud.


Pedantic

but shouldn't it be Hear FUCKING hear!

?


Ear fucking ear

That's what monkeys do


Album art isn't dead

It's just that crappy art is rife in major label land
Example:
http://truemetal.org/metalwallpaper/images/blessedarethesick.jpg
As compared to
http://www.roots-and-branches.com/Son%20Of%20Dork.jpg

Damn I love cheesy death metal artwork.


argh

that son of dork one is hideous.


Three words:

CONRAD

FUCKING

KEELY


the blond one from son of dork

was at a pub i was at last night and someone asked if he was in son of dork and he got really embaressed and mumbled yes before talking about something completely different, cant say i blame him


Art is dead !

Get over it !


lol


i think

that there are few bands that have created artwork in the past, ooh, five years that will be hailed in the same company as those Seymour mentioned up there. Not that that means there hasn't en anything that's ben worth it because there has.

Uhm.


I think

That as removable media in general is suffering a gradual decline at the hands of digital technologies, artwork needs to evolve with it. I'm not sure how yet. I like big pictures and bright colours on 7" and 12" sleeves too. But the entire way people find and listen to music is changing, so everything else will as a result - which has good points, such as democratisation of what's available and what's good, and loosening the major label grip on what people are able to hear - and bad, such as the death of various formats, and their associated packaging and artwork.


I take some of that back.

Reading the Constellation mission stataement suggests that there will always be people who produce things carefully on a smaller scale. A more realistic reading of the situation might suggest that rather than kill of certain formats, the 'digital music revolution' might just further ghettoize things like vinyl, as the majority of people simply won't have a record player. Which does make things even more difficult for the smaller DIY labels - working on a minority format even further limits their potential listeners. This is a few years down the line, you can still pick up record players at Argos as far as I know... but not for long I reckon.


Indeed.

There are still people who go and see plays even though films are cheap and more readily availible. Bad analogy perhaps.

But there are lots of record labels who still lovingly produce vinyl that is incredibly beautiful. Labels like Constellation, Marriage, Burnt Toast Vinyl and there ilk put even more effort into producing lush records, whether they come with massive inserts, hand etched, silk screened covers, or the crushed penny that still comes with every copy of F#A#. They realise that what they're doing is for a limited consumer base and that said consumers buy their records purely for aesthetic reasons. And as such I think even though we will see a massive decline the labels that care will respond by making more their records even more aestheticly pleasing.


...

We recently made our own cd cases because we felt that we didnt want our music to be surrounded by the same damn medium as every other record and it pays off, people actually appreciate the time and effort we put in. It makes the whole thing seem a little more personal.


i think you were right first time

i hate album artwork most of the time anyway.