Sign In: or Sign Up! (forgotten password?)

An open letter to Jose Gonzalez

Dear Jose,

Today I was listening to Xfm and they twice played your 'cover version' of the Knife's 'Heartbeats'. I use the above quotation marks because I prefer to think of your recording of this song as a castration rather than a cover.

Your whimsical, pedestrian, dickless fumble through this song is an embarrasment to the notion of tender acoustic music. The idea that you can strip away the essence of what may be a heavily produced record to the simple beating heart inside (no pun intended) is not a new one, nor is it one which normally produces such a fucking DULL rendition.

I don't know if you've actually listened to the Knife's recording of the song. Just in case you don't have access to a copy let me describe it for you... I would characterise it as a vibrant technicolour pop song, propulsive, funky and distinctive groove, topped off with passionate and unique vocals carrying deceptively dark lyrics. The kind of brilliant fusion of euphoria and melancholy which can soundtrack either mood.

I would characterise your version of the song thus: like being slapped in the face with a wet leaf by someone who's only just woken up.

Couldn't you be arsed to sing? Couldn't you be arsed to emote? Did you think about what the lyrics meant? Or were you just dicking about with the tape still running and accidentally scored a hit? Really you could've tried a second take at least, once you'd got used to the words.

The fact that your version appears to have become the more popular thanks to an appearance in a TV advert for coloured bouncy balls is the ulitmate irony. 'Heartbeats' by the Knife is a coloured bouncy ball of a song. 'Heartbeats' by Jose Gonzalez (or 'Flatlines' as I LOLingly prefer to think of it) is a soggy old tennis ball, which, if thrown for retrieval by even the most easily pleased of dogs, would scarcely elicit a reaction.

It's a triumph for the chin-stroking 'real music' brigade (the ones who keep Rolling Stone magazine in circulation), that your version has gained superioty and your dull little album has yawned it's way into the charts via the pockets of people who buy all their music in train stations.

Just think Jose, you're a singer songwriter whose success in this country is down to a COVER VERSION featured on ADVERT. On which you can barely be arsed to raise your voice let alone sing.

Please, if you're considering covering another song, PLEASE ask me first. You can even come round to my house and I'll record it for you. Perhaps we can attach some electrodes to your balls (if you have any) to liven up your performance?

with warmest regards
restlessboy



  • wow wow wow

    this post is much too long !
    Can't be bother to read it...

    • when he gets into a subject, he really goes for it.

      and, sadly on this occasion, is wrong.
      bye!

  • ouch!

    his album's actually decent.

    • on behalf of

      and in short

      Dear Jose

      your "music" and subsequent rise to "stardom" on the back of a "cover" and advert is akin to gainging pleassure from swallowing big hairy mans balls-this does NOT pleasure me.

      yours

      restlessboy

      • not true

        some people would considering swallowing big hairy man balls loads of fun.

        'flatlines' is not fun by any standard.

        • so my assumption that YOU

          dont like swallowing big hairy mans balls is incorrect...what DID happened at igethitbyemokids house?!

  • :D

    this is ace.

  • Fair enough..

    "Just think Jose, you're a singer songwriter whose success in this country is down to a COVER VERSION featured on ADVERT. On which you can barely be arsed to raise your voice let alone sing."

    I've never really thought of it like that until now but i guess you're right. Silent Shout is an amazing album. They deserve the success. Though Veneer isn't that bad.

  • summary:

    your version of 'Heartbeats' is fucking rubbish. you have no genitals.

    • phew.

      thanks :)

    • thanks !

      Still don't understand what you're talking about...

    • Relentlessboy

      Your mum has genitals.

  • you are so very right.

    I really, really dislike his version of that song.

    The orignal is such a wonderful, interesting pop song, full of exciting and odd sounds. It's so colourful sounding.

    Gonzalez's version is just bland, soulless strum-a-long. He adds totally nothing to the song at all.

    • I think

      It's better. Actually I don't but I can take them both alongside one another. Poo you's! Besides, surely the Knife must have allowed it to be used on the ad seeing as they are the songwriters?

      • agreed.

        tis a top song, both versions. and the knife probably owe a lot of their popularity to people checking them out after that ad anyways.

    • its not a strum along

      music FACT

  • I prefer

    his cover to the original.

    • what's this tosh?

      "The idea that you can strip away the essence of what may be a heavily produced record to the simple beating heart inside (no pun intended) is not a new one."

      Has he ever claimed to be inventing some magical new thing?

    • to justify that:

      I think the cover gives it a lovely warm glow, and I really like the picked guitar patterns, unoriginal or not. I don't think it's bland, and I think the underemoting gives it a sad, resigned feel about it that works well.

      I can appreciate the icy, jarring electronics of the original too, and the slightly manic desperation of the vocals. But I just generally prefer the atmosphere of the cover. I think it's the mark of a good cover that it FEELS like a completely different song and not an imitation.

      That said, the only other Jose Gonzales song I've heard was really boring.

      • Crosses

        That's a great song

        • whenever I hear his voice

          I just think: "james taylor".
          and then I want to stab myself in the face with a rusty spoon.

  • I VASTLY

    prefer the Gonzalez version...

    • i like them both

      the threadstarters point is just ridiculous, if JG song/album wasnt played as much or popular he wouldnt have written this useless thread to start off with

      • That's obvious bob.

        There is no point in disliking something if it is not thrown at you constantly, and even though there is no point if it is, there is alot more reason to.

        • oh dan

          i know what side you're rooting for here.

          but for some reason i just can't help feel that people dislike this guy because he's quite popular not bacause of a hate for his music.

          • Lets agree to disagree hunny.

            All this arguing is putting a strain on our relationship.

            And I also wish you would spend less time with those floozies of yours, they make me jealous.

          • I've no idea how popular he is

            I just know that he's done a cack version of a song I love.

          • misplaced vitriol

            'Your whimsical, pedestrian, dickless fumble through this song is an embarrasment to the notion of tender acoustic music'.

            Stop being so predictably anti-populist, talk about over reacting. It's not a bad cover for fucks sake! Gonzales is a hell of a lot better than blunt and jack johnson. So it's a little over-exposed so what get over it. Im sure it hasn't harmed sales of the Knifes album either.

            • why's everyone going straight for the

              'you don't like it because it's popular' argument?

              my reasons for disliking it are spelled out ^^^there. I find it a lacklustre dispassionate reading of a song that I love for its vibrancy and energy. It's po-faced, half arsed, and most importantly it's dull.

              Let's not forget the Knife version isn't exactly obscure.

              • its half-poed

                and arse faced

      • I don't understand

        what you mean.

  • I like the cover.

    I like Jose Gonzalez.

    I don't like the Knife.

    Is he not friends with The knife? Or Did I make that up?

    • Silent Shout

      sounds exactly like When Doves Cry. FACT.

    • i prefer the gonzalez version

      usually acoustic covers are really dull but i dont think this one is, i think it is more emotive than the knife version which is alright but not that great to be honest

  • Hmmm

    I don't normally go for Jose's style of music, but for some reason he's one of those exceptions that prove the rule... I really like his stuff.

  • you know his next single is the Kylie cover, right?

    did he get your permission?

    • Hand On Your Heart, yeah

      i quite like it but only because i love the song. Although i love 'Heartbeats' too but hate this song. Uhm. i forgot my point.

      • The man is a covers MACHINE

        Not only is there 'Heartbeats' and 'Hand on your heart' on the album. In his live set her covers 'teardrop' by massive attack and he has also covered 'love will tear us apart' and 'born in the USA'.

        i personally love him. And i have done for a good year and a bit now. I saw him play with King Creosote some time ago with a very small audience watching, then again recently with a sold out threatre holding about 15 times the amount of people watching. Both times the audiences we're spellbound.

  • i honestly cannot comprehend anyone taking the cover

    over the original.

    maybe if you're extremely conservative, but this site isn't exactly Q, is it?

    christ.

  • I agree with everything you say.

    That version is a fucking pathetic recently deceased person's spunk bubble of an attempt at a cover.

    • spunk bubble?

      that at least sounds like it took some effort.

  • Jose

    I think your being ridiculous I like the song and I have heard the original version of heartbeats and it is an excellent song but I think that your blindness for new music is an insult to other people who appreciate music for what it is you seem like someone who likes to complain because basically they have nothing better to do. Try listening to the song and stop being so arrogant to music. Perhaps José did a different version to the song, which by the way you must love so much as to put down a very talented musician for his rendition, but it is still excellent music. You’re an embarrassment to anyone who has ever listened to and enjoyed music.

    • 1 post ^^^

      Is this Jose Gonzalez ?

    • you're funny

      can I keep you?

      • he's right though

        you don't have anything better to do. or, assuming your rationality, you would probably have done that, instead.

    • on_tha_run^^^

  • I agree

    I think it is indicative of a large scale music press trend of saying that electronic music cannot emote, when in fact strumming an acoustic guitar is often a lazy way to create a mood of emotion when there is none.

    Pedestrian sanitisation of a beautiful creation.

  • this is the one

    that rips off kate bush?

  • I heard it for the first time today

    It's alright I suppose.

    • have you been in a cocoon for the last 3 months

      ?

      • Nah

        I just don't watch much shite TV, and radio.

  • i like his cover more

    the vocalist on the original has an annoying accent.

    sorry.

    • also

      the synth tone sounds like something i used to use on my casio keyboard when i was 8.

      sorry again.

      • of course

        that isnt necessarily a problem. but in this case it just annoys me.

        • It's a great song

          For fuck's sake.

    • Agreed.

      I'm currently listening to the Knife's version, and I'm not liking it as much as Jose's.

      If I'd have known you liked The Knife I'd have brought a promo I have of their's to Manchester, Restlessman.