you that an anti-me post was gonna talk the sense of Bright Eyes and MySpace into me

I honestly dont know what that is supposed to mean!

I think ones controversial credentials are greatly enhanced by not swearing so much, shock people with your ideas not your choice of words.
jesusandhislawyer as a name is not controversial....why? because it is de rigour nowadays to use His name so, you are not fit to wash His feet with your hair, he was far more controversial than you.
I am not a christian, by the way, however I wish to wrest Jesus away from the Christians and give him back to the people as a role model, but if you are going to style yourself on him and take his name...which is fine...you should at least have the audacity to pick bigger targets other than absent sitting ducks, ones that fight back.... show true bravery, hiding behind....."I was only trying to provoke stimulating healthy discussion" is weak.


PS Rather disturbingly I realise that I have just checked out his profile to see his half naked body, I did that with Marco yesterday, perhaps I am turning gay?

I think ones controversial credentials are greatly enhanced by not swearing so much, shock people with your ideas not your choice of words.
jesusandhislawyer as a name is not controversial....why? because it is de rigour nowadays to use His name so, you are not fit to wash His feet with your hair, he was far more controversial than you.
I am not a christian, by the way, however I wish to wrest Jesus away from the Christians and give him back to the people as a role model, but if you are going to style yourself on him and take his name...which is fine...you should at least have the audacity to pick bigger targets other than absent sitting ducks, ones that fight back.... show true bravery, hiding behind....."I was only trying to provoke stimulating healthy discussion" is weak.


PS Rather disturbingly I realise that I have just checked out his profile to see his half naked body, I did that with Marco yesterday, perhaps I am turning gay?