Drowned in Sound

Search


Home > Reviews > Live


tears
Lineup: The Tears
Date: 16/02/2005
no votes
?
by Ross Bennett
Who would have thought that Brett Anderson and Bernard Butler would be back together, making music and playing gigs? Expectations are extremely high for The Tears' first major London show, and murmurs of “I reckon they will play the old stuff, ya know” can be heard everywhere before the lights go down and on strides Mr. Animal Nitrate himself. After two minutes of the piano balladeering that makes up 'Love As Strong As Death', a perfectly timed cry from the crowd of “F**king awful!” causes an immediate eruption of laughter and applause, which hilariously happens to coincide with the end of the song. Oh dear. Butler’s entrance causes a whoop from the front few rows, but the people seem so unenthused, it feels that The Tears have already lost this one. Thankfully, Butler’s guitar – he’s still an inventive and exciting player – seems to tickle the atmosphere enough to get some hands in the air and some feet off the floor. ‘The Lovers’ is Anderson and Butler doing what they do best – a catchy chorus propelled by a strong, resonating melody, backed by dive-bombing guitar eccentricities – it’s glorious. Anderson’s vocals still manage to soar and Butler’s semi acoustic seems to warble and crash like it was made to.

Unfortunately, this is, as they say, it. The next three songs are indistinguishable from one another, and the energy on stage seems to be at such a low ebb that Anderson’s “I’m itching my bum against a brick wall” dance and the occasional spin from Butler remain the only movements visible. The songs, at this stage, just aren’t good enough. There is no sustenance. A flicker of guitar ingenuity and a clever lyrical quip are all very well, but a to pull off a top quality performance you’re going to need more than a few sonic pleasantries. There’s no bite, no edge. This is The Tears' sixth gig and they already sound (technical problems aside) flat. Their past is of course inescapable. They seem like they want to please the people and deliver the sort of songs that made their former band so worshipped. Yet on tonight’s show at least, the partnership that once spawned two fantastic albums of ethereal pop heaven, fall very short indeed.

Post a new comment on this review

The Tears

You should have come to the Joiners, 65 Days Of Static were ace.

The Tears

I've never ever been to a gig where I have felt truly embarassed to be there. This was one of them. What a shame.

The Tears

My mate assures me that The Magic Numbers were brilliant though.
I would have gone but I was in the Mean Fiddler instead watching Burst/Mastodon/Dozer which was pretty consistent gig, not amazingly thrilling though.

Re: The Tears

They were, as always, fantastic.

The Tears

The proof of the pudding will be in the album.
Suede were never as good live as they were on record, either.

The Tears

proper review please.......

The Tears

ha ha! Ross Bennett you have no idea what you are talking about. The Tears don't play Suede songs and were never going to at the Astoria. And Lovers 'glorious'!! come off it. It's one of the worst of their new songs. Not bad but nowhere near as good as Refugees, Autograph, Two Creatures, Brave New Century, Ghost of You, The Asylum, the list is long. Apollo 13 is an epic and A Love as Strong as Death is utterly beautiful. Brett and Bernard really have written some of the best stuff of their careers.

The Tears

Perhaps you should have a quick re-read dear...

I didn't say I thought The Tears were going to play Suede songs - that was what I overheard many people discussing before the gig. Brett Anderson and Bernard Butler have chosen to play together again and comparisons to their former glories are inevitable from both fans and critics.

The Lovers is a fine song. The rest of the gig was truly uninspiring.




The Tears

no honestly, don't embarrass yourself any further.

The Tears

Watch out ross,

Fanbase on the horizon!

The Tears

Saw the 1st gig at heaven and thought it was distinctly average, thought they would have got better by now though, preferred mcalmont & butler live to be honest

The Tears

the person asking for a 'proper review' because this doesnt agree with their opinion, well done, you rule.

The Tears

Mr Future sir! On the other review of the Tears on DiS in Oxford, one of your pictures were used, therefore I presume that you were at that Oxford gig. Was the Tears gig at the Astoria simply just a bad gig or are the songs poor? I haven't heard anything by them yet, no joy on Kazaa etc, and I'm curious to start chasing them up when I get back to Blighty. I was just wondering as to your opinion on both gigs and whether you think they are any good.

Re: The Tears

Based on the live show, don't bother, the songs are crap, A New Morning-Suede with Berny playing guitar.

Predictable and far too mechanical.

The Tears

I was at the Astoria gig and I'm by no means a big Suede fan (I don't even own Dog Man Star), but I thought The Tears were really good. There was tons of energy coming from the stage and both Brett & Bernard looked on top form. I thought the ballad they started with was excellent and some of the songs towards the end of the set were good too.

The Magic Numbers were the best band of the night though. The Dead 60's who were 2nd on the bill were cliched rubbish!

The Tears

i think he asked for a 'proper review' because the original was gleaming with some obvious errors.

For example, the twat at the start shouted "awful" yes, but no fucking involved..., and the laughter was clearly delayed through embarassment.
He talks of 'Butler's entrance', when he must have been blind not to see him already on stage, playing keyboard on the first song.
I wouldn't say the audience was unenthused, more wary, most people had no idea what to expect. The reactions have got better and better each time they play, as have the band.

I'm not going to claim that the Tears walked on and WHAM were just as thrilling as Suede around the time of the first album (who had been writing and honing their set and live act for quite some time before being remotely noticed by anyone).
They do however have a handful of great songs, and several more very good ones, in my opinion. I also found them pretty exciting to watch, Bernard especially (were you there for the encore?!).

To be honest, the only reason I'm annoyed with this review is that you single out The Lovers as far and away their best song. Now, while it's decent pop song with some energy, it's not their best by any stretch of the imagination. Anyone else at the gig might reasonably assume you listened to that one song and then left. Must have been unconscious to miss out on Apollo 13 and The Ghost Of You! They're the two songs, along with possibly Autograph, that I would place on an equal level with early Suede songs. It's just a bit confusing, because I know if I thought that The Lovers is 'glorious', which I don't really, I would be in seventh heaven for the rest of the gig.

Anyway, each to their own, let's hope people get to hear the record and make up their own mind.

Speaking of which, the first play of Refugees is on Lamacq tonight apparently.

byesy bye





© DrownedinSound.com | From the Archive - DiScover: Chow Chow