Drowned in Sound

Search



R4_Gotham_cover

Radio 4: Gotham!

no votes
?
by Alice Dream

I saw Radio 4's video for their single 'Dance To The Underground' on MTV2, and was charmed by its spiky guitars and funky as hell disco beats and bass line. This is the sound of the future: punk disco. They followed it with the best video of the year - Electric Six, Danger Danger, High Voltage (which is one of my favourite songs of the decade already!).

For some reason I decided one of them was a novelty single, and the other was a REAL band with a real sound that owed more to Talking Heads and Magazine than the NME. It was with great pleasure then, that I picked up a copy of 'Gotham!' for a tenner in a Leeds market over Christmas.

To start off, it launches a pretty cool middle ground between Happy Mondays' debut record and the first couple by Talking Heads.

Then it hits me... After Dance To The Underground, the plan goes awry. Apart from the excellent, and curiously out of place 'Speaking In Code', the record seems to contain a number of flabby jams with the same rhythm running throughout. I remember the last time I heard something like this: Sixth Form. It used to emanate from the practise rooms of bands who hadn’t quite found the art of songwriting yet, but were learning their sound together.

Then it hits me (again)... We are living that in our music at the moment. So many of these “wonderful” new bands that flood the pages of NME and the trendy press are from the imitation generation. This is the era of rediscovery. Sounds have been unearthed that invoke nostalgia in the older generation of journalists, who spark that same interest anew in people who don’t remember their emergence the first time around.

Are we wearing the Emperor’s New Clothes? These bands are OK, but I went to Trash's New Years’ party, and one of their excellent djs played an album track from Echo And The Bunnymen's second (virtually unknown) album. It sounded contemporary and about 50 times more original than any of its recent imitators (sorry, Interpol…I still love you).

I still hold out hope for Radio 4, as all the live reviews I have read seem to eulogise them. The album is empty and tune free for the most part, but the highlights bring a great sound to new ears. I suppose this is a good thing.

Tried to be a review, ended up a rant! Again...

  • Radio 4 6 / 10

Radio 4 - Gotham!

You're exactly right AliceDream. All these bands are raking over old ground -sometimes they inject it with new life(Interpol) but in the main they're pretty tired.But it's good if it turns people on to all that great 80s indie. (By the way you were right about the Suede album too-it is pretty lukewarm).

Re: Radio 4 - Gotham!

Thanks.
I guess you are right about the "GO OUT AND BUY THE ORIGINALS"
A pity that there isn't something in the record shops that means that every derivative album has to wear a PMRC style sticker with a list of the bands' influences on.....

Re: Radio 4 - Gotham!

I totally disagree with the Gotham !! review. I love DIS, but get the sense sometimes that they feel compelled to dislike something just because it turns up in a "mainstream" mag like NME. At least you guys overseas don't have to deal with the crap they say is good in Rolling Stone. Radio 4 is one of the better bands out right now in the States, and I find their brand of post punk (however you want to label it) irresistable and impossible to stop listening to. Are they influenced by earlier bands? Sure, what band isn't? Do they lack orginality and innovation? Absolutely not. If you're gonna knock a band's album have the gumption to do so because their sound doesn't appeal to you, not because you think they failed to match the second Echo and the Bunnymen album. 'Course that's just an opinion.

Re: Radio 4 - Gotham!

Sorry, I think you missed the point.
I DO like their sound, just they fail to live up to my initial liking FOR that sound with a weak album.
GUMPTION?
You're funny

Re: Radio 4 - Gotham!

Oh, and reread the final sentence, btw!
"The album is empty and tune free for the most part, but the highlights bring a great sound to new ears. I suppose this is a good thing."

And you thought I disliked them as a band...... Silly

Re: Radio 4 - Gotham!

Hey sorry. Didn't mean to strike a nerve. I guess you really can like a band even though you think their first big album (their second total) is weak and you haven't seen them live. How SILLY of me.
It's just my opinion anyway. But I hate to see all these great new bands come out who can't sing a note without being crucified for not only sounding like somone else, but also for not being as good as the band they sound like.
People crap on The Vines for being Nirvana rip offs, on Interpol (a band you and I both love) for sounding like Joy Division, on Radio 4 and the Rapture for failing to properly carry on the torch of 80's indie.
Knowing that you dislike a band that I love because you really feel their album is weak, makes me feel better. I just wanted to make sure that DIS hadn't fallen into the trap of disliking a band for the wrong reasons: not because the reviewer disliked the sound of the band, but because that band didn't equal the glory of their influences.
That's all I got, thanks for taking the time to respond to my previous comments.

Re: Radio 4 - Gotham!

My pleasure, good Sir.
I hope to have the pleasure of seeing them soon.
At least I took the time to buy an album I was not sure about...... And liked three songs, which is above average anyway

Radio 4 - Gotham!

sorry to post again, but you should really check out an article at www.pitchforkmedia.com. there is a live review of Interpol at the Bowry Ballroom, and the reviewer says, rather well, what I was unsuccessfully trying to convey in my previous posting.