Drowned in Sound

Search



Arctic Monkeys

Arctic Monkeys: Whatever People Say I Am, That's What I'm Not

2 votes
?
by Rob Webb

Put yourself in the shoes of somebody who hasn't heard anything about Arctic Monkeys before placing this shiny disc in your stereo. Imagine, as unlikely as it is, that you didn't download it weeks ago. Even, and I know this is pushing it, pretend that you've not got sick of being told that they're the future of music.

Failing that, jump into the nearest time machine, set the dial for 'one year ago' and hold on tight. Soon enough you'll be stood outside The Room, a tiny Sheffield venue, waiting to see highly regarded newcomer Tom Vek play a gig. Venture inside and watch, jaw on the floor, as you see a teenage four-piece from High Green tear the place apart. Unsigned and with no ambition to do anything other than put out a record, this is how I'll always choose to remember the 'Monkeys once the inevitable happens and they 'do an Oasis'.

Fast forward to 2006 and their debut album is voted the fifth best British record of all time by NME ahead of 'OK Computer', 'Rubber Soul' and 'What's The Story...' Such an accolade has to be taken with a fistful of salt, but it proves how much things can change in a year. Some things don't, though. The venues may have increased in size but the song remains the same. Arctic Monkeys have an innate ability to soundtrack life in the noughties and it's this, not clever marketing or the internet, that has taken them to the summit of popular music.

These are songs that anyone can relate to, and they're as catchy as hell to boot. It's a simple formula in theory, but to execute it with this much vim and vigour is something most bands struggle to do in their entire career. Ever been out to a club and stood at the side afraid to make the first move? Do you disapprove of some of the things your friends do? Does your girlfriend get annoyed with you sometimes? If you can answer 'no' to all three of these questions, you're an alien. In some ways it'd make the task of reviewing this album much easier because MTV hasn't yet worked out how to transmit to Mars, but back here on earth this is a record that deals in the currency of life.

That in itself would be a bit boring. I mean, who really wants to hear about the monotony of a full-time job or failing to pull when they can experience these things at first hand by getting out of bed? Not me. What I do want to hear is somebody who can describe these phenomena with a wit that wouldn't be out of place in a stand-up show. Step forward Alex Turner, and the cast of characters he conjures up. The girl with the fake tan who you'd still be happy to wake up with after a few pints ('Still Take You Home'), the indie types who wear hats indoors ('Fake Tales Of San Francisco') and the frustrated guy / angry girlfriend combo ('Mardy Bum') are all painfully familiar, but as with all good humour it's the way he delivers them.

So why put this album on and not a Ricky Gervais DVD? Because Gervais, despite the episode of 'The Office' where his guitar makes an appearance, doesn't produce an unashamedly melodic, punk-funk indie-pop racket, and the 'Monkeys do. They certainly don't hang around: with 13 songs in 40 minutes, the pace is breakneck from the outset and the only lull comes with the plaintive 'Riot Van'. Turbo charged guitar and a voluptuous rhythm section makes for a full dancefloor, and whether you look good on it or not that's where you're likely to be when you hear the majority of these tunes.

That has to be the main criteria for judging an album like this, and 'Whatever People Say I Am...' may not make you ponder the finer points of existentialism but it certainly has the ability to brighten even the dreariest of days. First and foremost it's a pop record, and it doesn't have to be big or clever as long as it makes a connection. When it comes to doing that, the 'Monkeys are better than Nokia. The album may have been sat on your computer for weeks, you're almost certainly sick of hearing about their rags to riches story (which, for once, happens to be true) and while Arctic Monkeys may not be the future of music, they're still a mighty fine present.


I'm no Cynic

.


Good review.

Good album too apart from the elongated jazzwank jam at the end of 'Vampires...'.


Cue: Cooler than thou wankers

good review of an excellent record.

now just sit and wait for all the above-mentioned cooler-than-thou types to come and slag them off once again.


i find

this record boring. im finding it increasingly difficult to listen to new guitar bands because they all sound the bloody same.


I've heard the songs...

...on the radio, in music shops etc. I won't be buying it. It's just very average. They offer nothing new or exciting.


Love It.

Yet strangely i prefer some of the demos. Go figure.


You Too?

how could anyone not love these guys! there's a certain magnetism about their music, you just keep on going back for more every time!


shit

these guys are terrid so bad, not arsehole indie views just cant stand them, all my friends like them and 3 years ago it was twista albums they were buying, chavs in converse!


does not liking this band

instantly make you an indie snob?

i'm not cool.
i don't like this band.
am i a bad person?


Pish

Can't be arsed being constructive. They are just pish. So there.


i never used

the phrase 'indie snob'. you did, cos you have obviously been called it before.


and actual blood

- how did you become so articulate?


having been at work all day

i haven't been able to reply to this.
But, as alcxxk says, "cooler than thou wankers" more than implies "indie snob" to me.

and, so you know, i have indeed been called "indie snob," but only by people who collect the free cd's that come with the Daily Mail. Yup.


igtit.

i've never bought the daily mail, so have missed out on these free cd's you talk of. which is a shame... or - hang on a minute- is that the standard insult you use to people who accuse you of being up your own arse? must be wearing that one thin by now (the insult- not your arse).

did you give any reason for not liking this band? or do you just like distancing yourself from it to look like some sort of renegade?

actually, i don't know why i am bothering with this. if you don't like them it is your loss.


no i did not give a reason for not liking this band

much like you did not give a reason for denouncing those who don't like it as cooler than thou wankers.

is it my loss? maybe it is my loss. maybe my self imposed, Chuck Norris esque outsider stance is harming my ability to enjoy tired, second hand pub rock and not that clever at all lyrics. maybe such emotional isolation will ultimately leave me adrift from the world of man, leaving me to die poor and alone in a hotel in Hastings. gawd.


we can only hope

that you turn out to be right.


LOL

.


You two

Need to chill out. Shellfish needs to stop being so touchy about a band he likes and not insult en masse everyone who dislikes them, and igethitbyemokids needs to be less touchy.
For the record, people who harp on about people who don't like popular bands being indie snobs need to get a life, for fuck's sake! And also to realise that some of us like music for music's sake. I think this band's a very 5/10, 6/10 band? Does that make me an indie snob?


nope

just makes you wrong.


cooler than thou wankers

vs
indie snobs

not much, if any, difference.

assmonkey


Does no-one else see

...the irony here?

What with all this name-calling - "indie snobs", "cooler than thou wankers" and whatever else. This is mainly being done by the people who like this album, but the album's called "Whatever people say I am, that's what I'm not"!!!?!!??!!


the album title

is also the worst album title ever, along with the cover image. shoulda renamed it "however cool im trying to look in this photo, thats how cool im not".
a shame really cos i like the band, just thought they could have used a bit more imagination than sticks and stones!


Nobody seems to mention...

the production on this album is bloody awful! There's some potentially great songs here but they just end up sounding so weak. Shame that.


agree

yeah the demos are better but i love them so much!


.

I love this arcticle


Accolades

I think the review was really good. The hard thing about this band is if I look at what they do on paper, it wouldn't really deserve the accolades...but in my heart of hearts I think they actually DO deserve plenty of accolades.

Are the lyrics any better than the Kaisers or Hard-Fi?? Probably not, I think, Certainly influenced by Mike Skinner, but not quite reaching the same level as OPM did. musically, they're every bit as 1979-81 as everyone else around...

Yet when I heard them for the first time it was as if this was the ONLY newnewnewwaveofnewwave band who actually GOT it, who actually had the same energy/anger/whateverthefuck/Jenesaisquoi/mojo as early Jam or XTC, The Stranglers etc.

The issue I have with most 'new' songwriting bands is that they tend to polish off all the raw edges when they come to make records. With those who (barfs repeatedly) aim straight for the mainstream soft rock middle of the road, I guess that's just what they have to do to get onto the Wallpaper FM playlist, but with all the new wavers it castrates the music. The Arctic Monkeys are certainly the songwriting match of acts like the Kaiser Chiefs, Maximo Park, even Franz Ferdinand, but the thing that attracts me to them is they've left the rawness intact. The record is so much more REAL for that.


I don't get it...

Everybody hates chavs but....

Everybody loves songs about being a chav.

Pretty good record though, pure indie-disco fun.


overly defensive?

Give your view of the album - don't be so concerned with second guessing how others will respond to it. Telling 'us' to focus on the product and not the marketing seems a little contradictory given that most of the focus of this review is attempting to counter a perceived backlash. The most ironic thing of all though is that any review is part of that hype/anti-hype phenomenon you seem to have a problem with. You don't just point towards bands you give opinions of them. Reviewing *is* what creates the environment of exaggerated support and detraction.

plus ricky gervais vs alex turner??? - am I the only one who thought that was an odd thing to hinge two paragraphs of the review on.


Plus

why DID they put Adam Sandler on the cover?

p.s. it sounds shit, frankly.


Yes, odd.

But good reivew.


whats going on?

Is this a well written and accurate review on drownedinsound.com I see before me?

I think it might be. I'll be blowed!

This band is a bit like Wayne Rooney - there's loads of hype about them / him but you wonder quite why there aren't more bands / footballers out there doing rocking and catchy albums / raise-a-smile skills. This record / player really does show up how shit some bands / footballers that get signed are, because all in all, all it / he does is do more or less everything right. And that's it.

8/10, clap clap clap. Now please someone else do something as good so everyone shuts up about them!!


there are atually several

'well written and accurate' reviews on here


With all the hype...

...it would have been really easy to slag this record. So I'm glad you didn't, good review.

It's just a great album. Best lyricist since Jarvis, innit?


No, not as good as Jarvis

and also not as good as Bromhead's Jacket, 1984 and Milburn. But still good, and very good for the masses.


do you seriously believe

..that BJ, 1984 and Milburn are better than artic monkeys or are you just saying that to show off that you know of some other bands from south yorkshire.


Indeed.

The mentioned bands are shit, although I havent heard anything by Milburn. I'll just presume their shit.

The Arctic Monkeys are far better and I was ready to dismiss this album but I really like it.


Bromheads Jacket

ARE shit.
...and i swear 1984 are Arctic Monkeys' alter-egos. The Monkeys should sue otherwise. Wouldnt that be apt? The "band of our generation" suing their mates. How VERY 21st century.

Milburn are worth some of your time mind. The phrase 'Pleasantly surprised' comes to mind.
Unlike with this album.

That phrase would be 'Could do better'.


Rubbish...

Artic monkeys have been and will continue to be yet another rip off of the libertines, who were a rip off of the strokes. Awful band. Too much hype for a completely overrated band, more of the same I say.


yeah

I'm beginning to think that too


love them...

im normally such a snob when it comes to music, and dismiss a lot of it. but i really loved this album, its down to earth, lighthearted yet witty and it has an amazing fucking energy on the CD. i can relate to a lot of the subjects it ponders and a punky funky confident manner.


Poo

I think the arctic monkeys are like a big poo that won't flush. You stuff the toilet full of toilet paper to try and get rid of it and end up flooding the whole place.


personally

i heard mp3 from Arctic Monkeys, Bromheads Jacket, 1984, Milburn ( and some others i forgotten, thanks Jared ) at the same time.
The only one i liked are Bromheads Jacket.
Certainly not a good band, but a FUN band.
The rest is SHIT !
But it's just me.
And stop thinking people are elitists or show-offs.
They are allowed to their own taste !


...

Despite the debate to whether this band is shit or not. The music is fantastic, Its refreshingly new, original, and doesnt really sound specifically like any previous decent bands. I think the lads have done well for themselves over the past few months.

Come on then, who is going to bitch back at that comment?


...

'new' and 'original'? really? I must have heard the wrong songs, because all I hear is the same old indie-rock'n'roll.

I can understand they are a 'fun' band, they sing about 'funny things', real things. If you haven't got drunk and jumped around like a twat to at least two arctic monkeys songs, while actually living out the songs sentiments, then some might argue that you haven't lived.

I don't really think this makes them stand out as 'new' or 'original' though, and if we are judging bands on these merits then I can think of a lot bands who should sell more records.

I could just never imagine putting the record on in my bedroom and really listening to it, playing it over and over and finding new things each time. And I think all great records do that...


oblivious

to be honest until i bought the thing yesterday i had largely been unaware of the monkeys, but to be honest i have had it on 3 times already today and i'll probably put it back on in a sec. i am not going to state now that in 2 months (let alone this time next year) i shall still be enthralled by it it but for now it has me in a spin.

i can appreciate the lad above's comment tho, of course it isn't new or original but if it clicks then it clicks.


Hmm

I'm in an unsure position on this band. The way I see it, they're very reminiscent of a lot of other bands who've done similar things as well/better - i.e. I don't see them as deserving of anywhere near the level of hype they've gained. BUT that said, they've written a couple of ace indie disco dancefloor tunes and they're a bit of fun.

I'm sure I'd probably be cheerfully ignoring them if it wasn't for the fact that the sheer level of hype generated hadn't gotten me really riled up. As it stands, I don't mind them, but they're certainly not the saviours of modern music.


Yep

Spend your money on something worth your while.


Still Take You Home

it's a good album, but this songs content is fucking arrogant, and not really very good. Making me think the boy is really a cock. a lot of what they say stinks of arrogance, and this nice boy image is just that.


You could be wrong

I've been an avid watcher of this band pretty much from the time their demo producer played me some stuff back in early 2004 and I've met the band a few times. Alex is a lovely and quite genuine lad. I really like him. All the band members have got quite strong family support, and I think they all have a fair dollop of common sense. From what I've heard, they are as bemused by the level of success as anyone else is. They also know how completely fragile this can be and they just wanna play lots of gigs. In a way, their situation is similar to The Prodigy in the 90s. That band just about managed to survive by ignoring the hype and constantly touring. Singificantly, Prodigy are far less popular now, but just as good musically. Hype doesn't hve to kill a band the way it seems to have killed Oasis, who are just an embarressment these days.

I dunno, reviews of this album are always gonna be tainted by the media circus, but that isn't something they've played on. I think it's a good record. I hope they can continue to write more stuff, mature, get better, they're only kids after all. There are bands around in Sheffield who are just as good, but nowhere near as popular recording brilliant songs and generally being ignored, such as Champion Kickboxer. But I don't think they mind, 'cos like AMs, they're just music fans who wanna play their own stuff.

As for the arrogant tag, hmmm... You could day the same of Morrissey or Jarvis Cocker. Maybe it reads like that to you, but I don't think you're right.


arrogance

It seems to me that by ignoring the media they're gaining more attention than normal. I guess its debatable but does it occur to anyone that this could have been done on purpose by the band. They know there's hype, and they're ignoring it to gain more publicity.


Rhythm Stick

and this arctic monkeys have been hit with. i like a good dance to a few of their tunes. wouldn't buy album, little money so needs to be sumthing GDDDD before parting with it. A.M. are ok ish ish ishhhhsihsihsish little overplayed and overloved. overrated? i think so, but not too much.


Good review

Spot on

The future of music? Nah
A good part of the new wave of decent British bands? Yes


Potential

I can not believe that some find this record boring.Ok it's nothing new but it has so much energy and the fact that they're so young make this band the most potential since the Liberines and British sea power.Enjoy.

P.S: NME is always exaggerates.Don't pay too much attention to their reviews (good or bad).This record deserves 8/10.