Drowned in Sound

Search



This Et Al - Baby Machine

This Et Al: Baby Machine

1 vote
?
by ben marwood
  • Type: Album
  • Release date: 13/11/2006
  • Info: 500 ltd release now, full release to follow

Muse-like rock gods or merely an alright quartet from Leeds? This is the question which seems to rage around This Et Al, a rock outfit who seem capable of sounding like any number of bands at once.

Their eleven-track debut practically drips ambition, from the massive two-minute introduction to opener ‘The Loveliest Alarm’ to the feedback-laden ending of the closer ‘Transmit The Ends’. For a first foray into the world of long-players, it’s supremely confident, from the seamless, barely-noticeable time signature changes of ‘He Shoots Presidents’ to the almost tangible sense of vitriol firing from the cylinders of Baby Machine’s more hook-strewn moments, ‘Wardens’ and ‘Catscan’.

At the helm throughout sits frontman Wu, whose oft-straining, versatile voice is the most likely key to unlocking Baby Machine’s little mysteries. Whilst his bandmates take every opportunity to either pound out enormous drop-D riffage like early-rising bailiffs on an unsuspecting debtor’s door, or create a Muse-esque act-closing wall of noise, it is Wu’s versatile tones which best keep the wolves of repetition at bay. His approach changes from song to song, one moment matching the texture and presence of Tom Woodhead of ¡Forward Russia!, the next soaked in so much reverb that he sounds more like King Adora’s Matt Browne, albeit with a yell in place of the sneer.

Baby Machine’s numerous plus points serve to make it all the more frustrating when things don’t quite work. Quite why it doesn’t always work isn’t immediately obvious; there are a number of occasions where the ingredients are perfectly blended, but an equal number of instances where the big ideas just don’t seem to gel. Perhaps it’s down to the murky sound of the analogue-recording, or over-compression leaving the songs dynamically flat. At other points, it’s more down to a vocal mismatch. On ‘You’ve Driven For Miles (And Not Remembered A Thing)’, as guitars burst forth from all angles, the heavyweight chords and stop-start drums need something more than the vocals that interrupt, almost like Grant Nicholas in their faintly-gravelly texture.

Like dynamite with a damp fuse, something stops this from being the true explosion it probably should have been, but there is so much effort, ambition and maturity packed into Baby Machine that it’s a shame when it falls short of the target. These occasions might be in the minority, but they’re still enough to turn the end result from great to Merely Quite Good. Fans of the band will doubtless enjoy it instantly, though their detractors will probably find little here to prove themselves wrong.

  • This Et Al 7 / 10

I won't be buying it

Saw these guys support the amazing Snowden at the Metro a few weeks back. If it sounds anything like their live show it will be a poor splurge of eight notes and annoying vocals. Not sure how at any point This Et Al can be compared to Muse.


I agree

because Muse are shit, and these aren't.

Really good CD; and they were ace supporting Minus the Bear last week.


This Et Al...

...Eat Muse for breakfast. King Adora!?!? Are you on CRACK!?


nope

not on crack.

and they only sound like Muse when they're doing their whole Wall Of Noise thing. fuck knows where everyone else gets their comparisons from.


it's a good album

TEA are a good band and they don't sound a bit like Muse so I don't know where that shitty comparison comes from.

If anything the album has more nods towards Suede in places than anything.

They've crafted their own sound on a small budget so fair play to 'em.

I've seen them develop from something very ordinary to a band with a lot of real potential in the space of 3 years and this album is far better than expected so best of luck I say, they deserve it, but they clearly won't be everyones kettle of fish.


they dont

sound anything like muse, wtf? love them on cd, saw them at bethnall green where their sound was muddy as hell


i really, really like the album

one of the best out this year.

i thought they were really fucking good when i saw them in january supporting jeniferever, but i saw them on sunday supporting MTB and the sound was shite. it's no wonder alot of people don't like them, if id never heard them before sunday id have passed them off as total shit. the live shows definately vary...

and, muse?!


honestly

one of the most inspiring bands i've ever seen live, and one of the weirdest and best collections of songs i've ever heard. i think the fact that you compare them to muse above bands like queens of the stone age seems bizarre to me - they borrow more from the understated-yet-versatile imagination of QOTSA than the conceited pomposity of muse.

it's fuzzy and wonderful; epic, textured and kick-ass. i'd rate this album much higher than a 7.


eugh. sheesh.

will people get over the whole Muse thing yet? or i'm going to be forced to use the word "over-reacting".

the first Muse mention stems from their own press release. the second one comes from the big stadium climax to the last two tracks. and nothing else.

is their something in the DiS water this week?


haha. i meant "there".

pwned.


My Bloody Valentine or Trail Of Dead goddammit!

the album is good, but some of the original energy of the singles is lost in the re-records, so id agree with the review. Saw them support Minus The Bear in Manchester on Tues, thought it was ace, but the fucking boring crowd werent really intrested. Can't understand why this band seem to get critised, they are original, inspriring, and have a great sound. Wake up people!


the singer

sounds exactly like matt bellamy. I reckon thats enough to make them sound a bit like Muse really, get off Marwood's back douchebags. Saw them last night supporting Minus the Bear, I thought they were really interesting and they looked all the better when Brigade came on after them and licked balls. At one point i actually wanted to eat my own eyes.


The comparative equation of...

...Fat heavy guitars + Falsetto vocals = Muse, is overused and lazy. What about Queens? Deftones? Radiohead?


totally agreed that it's overused

but i wouldnt put those three bands in the same bracket as This Et Al either. maybe, just maybe, there's no one band that This Et Al sound like.


I'm glad you're completely

wrong on the Muse thing.

Muse are awful.

This Et Al are good.


I think...

...If these any band that they HAVE to be compared to, it is Interpol.


Love these

But the sound is a bit muddy. That said they probably don't have a massive budget. Even so for me it's not such a big deal because the songs are ace. b